The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Positive psychology: An introduction.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 · Cited by 11,351
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410 · Cited by 5,947
Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-0624 · Cited by 5,158
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268 · Cited by 4,623
Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification
CLONINGER, C. R. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.820-a · Cited by 4,178
O’connor, B. P. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200807 · Cited by 4,116
(1988) · Cited by 4,111
Cited by
Kashdan, T. B., Weeks, J. W., & Savostyanova, A. A. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.012 · Cited by 258
Self-citationA multi-level framework of inclusive leadership in organizations
Nishii, L. H., & Leroy, H. (2022) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011221111505 · Cited by 189
Flow at Work: a Self-Determination Perspective
Bakker, A. B., & van Woerkom, M. (2017) · Occupational Health Science · doi:10.1007/s41542-017-0003-3 · Cited by 187
Quinlan, D. M., Swain, N., Cameron, C., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2015) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.920407 · Cited by 184
Rice, S., Gleeson, J., Davey, C., Hetrick, S., Parker, A., Lederman, R., Wadley, G., Murray, G., Herrman, H., Chambers, R., et al. (2018) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/eip.12354 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-19
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098458146
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 17.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004
- The paper
- Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
