Cited by 9Emotional Intelligence and PerformancePersonality Traits and PsychologyGender Diversity and Inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Selecting your boss: Sex, age, IQ and EQ factors

Furnham, Adrian, McClelland, Alistair, Mansi, Angela·2012·Personality and Individual Differences

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Managers with higher trait EI scores are preferred by their employees.

    “Managers with higher trait EI scores are preferred by their employees (Furnham, McClelland, & Mansi, 2012), who tend to be more satisfied (Zampetakis & Moustakis, 2010) and less stressed (Mikolajczak, Balon, Ruosi, & Kotsou, 2012).”

    From Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research (2016) · cites this paper as Furnham, McClelland, & Mansi, 2012

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Ballinger, 2009, Will you trust your new boss?, Leadership Quarterly, 20, 219, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.012 · DOI
  2. Cook, 1999, Bottom-up versus top-down evaluation of candidates’ managerial potential: An experimental study, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 423, 10.1348/096317999166770 · DOI
  3. Furnham, 2002, Rating a boss, a colleague and a subordinate, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 655, 10.1108/02683940210450475 · DOI
  4. Furnham, 2007, Factors affecting allocation of scarce medical resources across life-threatening medical conditions, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2903, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00287.x · DOI
  5. Furnham, 2010, The allocation of a scarce correctional resource, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1605, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00631.x · DOI
  6. Furnham, 2006, Deciding on promotions and redundancies, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 6, 10.1108/02683940610643189 · DOI
  7. Furunes, 2007, Why diversity management fails, Hospitality Management, 26, 974, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.12.003 · DOI
  8. Gilbert, 2010, Does gender matter? A review of work-related gender commonalities, Gender in Management, 25, 676, 10.1108/17542411011092336 · DOI
  9. Hoyt, 2009, Choosing the best (wo)man for the job: The effects of mortality salience, sex, and gender stereotypes on leader evaluations, Leadership Quarterly, 20, 233, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.016 · DOI
  10. Petrides, 2006, The role of trait emotional intelligence in a gender specific model of organisational variables, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 552, 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00019.x · DOI
  11. Prime, 2009, Women “take care”, Men “take charge”: Managers’s stereotypic perceptions of women and men leaders, Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12, 25, 10.1080/10887150802371799 · DOI
  12. Shore, 2003, Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager age and employee age, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 529, 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.529 · DOI
  13. Sy, 2006, Relations of employee and management emotional intelligence to job satisfaction and performance, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 68, 461, 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Furnham, A., McClelland, A., & Mansi, A.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Westminster (GB)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
552-556
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990439335
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
Keywords
emotional intelligence, IQ, gender bias, age, social skills, workplace leadership, hiring preferences, gender differences in hiring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review