Cited by 132Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceDiverse Music Education InsightsNeuroscience and Music Perception

Creativity and personality in classical, jazz and folk musicians

Open access
Benedek, Mathias, Borovnjak, Barbara, Neubauer, Aljoscha C., Kruse-Weber, Silke·2014·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

The music genre of jazz is commonly associated with creativity. However, this association has hardly been formally tested. Therefore, this study aimed at examining whether jazz musicians actually differ in creativity and personality from musicians of other music genres. We compared students of classical music, jazz music, and folk music with respect to their musical activities, psychometric creativity and different aspects of personality. In line with expectations, jazz musicians are more frequently engaged in extracurricular musical activities, and also complete a higher number of creative musical achievements. Additionally, jazz musicians show higher ideational creativity as measured by divergent thinking tasks, and tend to be more open to new experiences than classical musicians. This study provides first empirical evidence that jazz musicians show particularly high creativity with respect to domain-specific musical accomplishments but also in terms of domain-general indicators of divergent thinking ability that may be relevant for musical improvisation. The findings are further discussed with respect to differences in formal and informal learning approaches between music genres.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.064

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classical musicians score lower in openness compared to jazz and folk musicians.

    “supports the finding that classical musicians score lower in openness compared to jazz and folk musicians.”

    From The musician’s personality: Do personality traits vary according to ensemble membership? (2023) · cites this paper as Benedek et al., 2014

    The Results section reports that classical musicians tended to be less open to new experiences than jazz and folk musicians. The claim omits that qualification: the overall openness effect was only a trend (p = .06), and the comparisons with jazz (p = .06) and folk (p = .11) were not statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only one previous study has examined musician ensemble membership and personality.

    “To our knowledge, only one previous study that examined musician ensemble membership and personality.”

    From The musician’s personality: Do personality traits vary according to ensemble membership? (2023) · cites this paper as Benedek et al., 2014

    The Results section ('Genre-related differences in personality'; page unavailable) compares personality across classical, jazz, and folk musicians. The Participants section groups musicians by their music-study genre, not by ensemble membership. The paper therefore supports the claim that a previous study examined musician groups and personality, but not the more specific claim about ensemble membership or the assertion that it was the only such study. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Benedek et al. (2014) found that folk musicians are more extraverted than jazz and classical musicians and that folk and jazz musicians tend to be more open than classical musicians.

    “Benedek et al. (2014) found that folk musicians are more extraverted than jazz and classical musicians and that folk and jazz musicians tend to be more open than classical musicians.”
  • Benedek et al. (2014) found no significant difference in neuroticism between jazz, classical, and folk musicians, and did not examine neuroticism as a predictor.

    “Benedek et al. (2014) did not find a significant difference between jazz, classical, and folk musicians in terms of neuroticism, but they did not look at neuroticism as a predicting factor.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Beaty, R.E., Smeekens, B.A., Silvia, P.J., & Kane, M.J. (in press). A first look at the role of domain-general cognitive and creative abilities in Jazz improvisation. Psychomusicology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034968. · DOI
  2. Benedek M. Fink A. Neubauer A.C. Enhancement of ideational fluency by means of computer-based training Creativity Research Journal 18 2006 317 328
  3. Benedek M. Franz F. Heene M. Neubauer A.C. Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity Personality and Individual Differences 53 2012 480 485 22945970 PMC3387381
  4. Benedek M. Mühlmann C. Jauk E. Neubauer A.C. Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: Effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 7 2013 341 349 PMC4001084 24790683
  5. Bézenak C. Swindells R. No pain, no gain? Motivation and self-regulation in music learning International Journal of Education & the Arts 10 16 2009
  6. Fink A. Grabner R.H. Benedek M. Neubauer A.C. Divergent thinking training is related to frontal electroencephalogram alpha synchronization European Journal of Neuroscience 23 2006 2241 2246 16630071
  7. Hill R.W. Huelsman T.J. Furr R.M. Kibler J. Vicente B.B. Kennedy C. A new measure for perfectionism: The perfectionism inventory Journal of Personality Assessment 82 2004 80 91 14979837
  8. Kaufman J.C. Beghetto R.A. Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity Review of General Psychology 13 2009 1 12
  9. Kruse-Weber S. Parncutt R. Error tolerance and error prevention in music performance: risk vs. error management Williamon A. Goebl W. Proceedings of the international symposium on performance science 2013 European Association of Conservatoires Brussels 27 32
  10. Lang J.W.B. Fries S. A revised 10-item version of the achievement motives scale: Psychometric properties in german-speaking samples European Journal of Psychological Assessment 22 2006 216 224
  11. Pressing J. Improvisation: methods and models Sloboda J.A. Generative processes in music 1988 Oxford University Press Oxford 129 178
  12. Rybowiak V. Garst H. Frese M. Batinic B. Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence Journal of Organizational Behavior 20 1999 527 547
  13. Williamon Q. Valentine E. Quantity and quality of musical practice as predictors of performance quality British Journal of Psychology 91 2000 353 376 10958579

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benedek, M., Borovnjak, B., Neubauer, A. C., & Kruse-Weber, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Graz (AT)
  • University of Music and Performing Arts Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Benedek, Mathias
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
63
Issue
100
Pages
117-121
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064231178
Cited by
132
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
10.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (P23914)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
creativity, personality, jazz musicians, classical musicians, folk musicians, divergent thinking, openness to experience, musical improvisation, formal and informal learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review