Creativity and personality in classical, jazz and folk musicians
Open accessAbstract
The music genre of jazz is commonly associated with creativity. However, this association has hardly been formally tested. Therefore, this study aimed at examining whether jazz musicians actually differ in creativity and personality from musicians of other music genres. We compared students of classical music, jazz music, and folk music with respect to their musical activities, psychometric creativity and different aspects of personality. In line with expectations, jazz musicians are more frequently engaged in extracurricular musical activities, and also complete a higher number of creative musical achievements. Additionally, jazz musicians show higher ideational creativity as measured by divergent thinking tasks, and tend to be more open to new experiences than classical musicians. This study provides first empirical evidence that jazz musicians show particularly high creativity with respect to domain-specific musical accomplishments but also in terms of domain-general indicators of divergent thinking ability that may be relevant for musical improvisation. The findings are further discussed with respect to differences in formal and informal learning approaches between music genres.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Classical musicians score lower in openness compared to jazz and folk musicians.
“supports the finding that classical musicians score lower in openness compared to jazz and folk musicians.”
From The musician’s personality: Do personality traits vary according to ensemble membership? (2023) · cites this paper as Benedek et al., 2014
The Results section reports that classical musicians tended to be less open to new experiences than jazz and folk musicians. The claim omits that qualification: the overall openness effect was only a trend (p = .06), and the comparisons with jazz (p = .06) and folk (p = .11) were not statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOnly one previous study has examined musician ensemble membership and personality.
“To our knowledge, only one previous study that examined musician ensemble membership and personality.”
From The musician’s personality: Do personality traits vary according to ensemble membership? (2023) · cites this paper as Benedek et al., 2014
The Results section ('Genre-related differences in personality'; page unavailable) compares personality across classical, jazz, and folk musicians. The Participants section groups musicians by their music-study genre, not by ensemble membership. The paper therefore supports the claim that a previous study examined musician groups and personality, but not the more specific claim about ensemble membership or the assertion that it was the only such study. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBenedek et al. (2014) found that folk musicians are more extraverted than jazz and classical musicians and that folk and jazz musicians tend to be more open than classical musicians.
“Benedek et al. (2014) found that folk musicians are more extraverted than jazz and classical musicians and that folk and jazz musicians tend to be more open than classical musicians.”
From The musician’s personality: Do personality traits vary according to ensemble membership? (2023) · cites this paper as Benedek et al. (2014)
Benedek et al. (2014) found no significant difference in neuroticism between jazz, classical, and folk musicians, and did not examine neuroticism as a predictor.
“Benedek et al. (2014) did not find a significant difference between jazz, classical, and folk musicians in terms of neuroticism, but they did not look at neuroticism as a predicting factor.”
From The musician’s personality: Do personality traits vary according to ensemble membership? (2023) · cites this paper as Benedek et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity
Feist, G. J. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5 · Cited by 2,180 · see citing works
The road to creative achievement: a latent variable model of ability and personality predictors
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1941 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Self-citationDeliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert?
Hambrick, D. Z., Oswald, F. L., Altmann, E. M., Meinz, E. J., Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2014) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.001 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Perceived performance anxiety in advanced musicians specializing in different musical genres.
Papageorgi, I., Creech, A., & Welch, G. (2013) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735611408995 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Beaty, R.E., Smeekens, B.A., Silvia, P.J., & Kane, M.J. (in press). A first look at the role of domain-general cognitive and creative abilities in Jazz improvisation. Psychomusicology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034968. · DOI
- Benedek M. Fink A. Neubauer A.C. Enhancement of ideational fluency by means of computer-based training Creativity Research Journal 18 2006 317 328
- Benedek M. Franz F. Heene M. Neubauer A.C. Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity Personality and Individual Differences 53 2012 480 485 22945970 PMC3387381
- Benedek M. Mühlmann C. Jauk E. Neubauer A.C. Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: Effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 7 2013 341 349 PMC4001084 24790683
- Bézenak C. Swindells R. No pain, no gain? Motivation and self-regulation in music learning International Journal of Education & the Arts 10 16 2009
- Fink A. Grabner R.H. Benedek M. Neubauer A.C. Divergent thinking training is related to frontal electroencephalogram alpha synchronization European Journal of Neuroscience 23 2006 2241 2246 16630071
- Hill R.W. Huelsman T.J. Furr R.M. Kibler J. Vicente B.B. Kennedy C. A new measure for perfectionism: The perfectionism inventory Journal of Personality Assessment 82 2004 80 91 14979837
- Kaufman J.C. Beghetto R.A. Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity Review of General Psychology 13 2009 1 12
- Kruse-Weber S. Parncutt R. Error tolerance and error prevention in music performance: risk vs. error management Williamon A. Goebl W. Proceedings of the international symposium on performance science 2013 European Association of Conservatoires Brussels 27 32
- Lang J.W.B. Fries S. A revised 10-item version of the achievement motives scale: Psychometric properties in german-speaking samples European Journal of Psychological Assessment 22 2006 216 224
- Pressing J. Improvisation: methods and models Sloboda J.A. Generative processes in music 1988 Oxford University Press Oxford 129 178
- Rybowiak V. Garst H. Frese M. Batinic B. Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence Journal of Organizational Behavior 20 1999 527 547
- Williamon Q. Valentine E. Quantity and quality of musical practice as predictors of performance quality British Journal of Psychology 91 2000 353 376 10958579
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
Self-citationThe neuroscience of musical improvisation
Beaty, R. E. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.004 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
The musician’s personality: Do personality traits vary according to ensemble membership?
Heydel, Z. L., Smith, R. D., & Grevstad, N. (2023) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/03057356221096779 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Benedek, M., Borovnjak, B., Neubauer, A. C., & Kruse-Weber, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Graz (AT)
- University of Music and Performing Arts Graz (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Benedek, Mathias
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 100
- Pages
- 117-121
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3989052
- OpenAlex
- W2064231178
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (P23914)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- creativity, personality, jazz musicians, classical musicians, folk musicians, divergent thinking, openness to experience, musical improvisation, formal and informal learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review