Goal conflict and well-being: a review and hierarchical model of goal conflict, ambivalence, self-discrepancy and self-concordance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 154
- Authors
- Kelly, R. E., Mansell, W., & Wood, A. M.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Stirling (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kelly, Rebecca E.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 212-229
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2186304915
- Semantic Scholar
- 6a1f25ed83da93231024182e87e5f1dfa8ec50c5
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 14.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- ESRC (RES-060-25-0044)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- goal conflict, ambivalence, self-discrepancy, self-concordance, well-being, goal hierarchy, intrinsic motivation, hierarchical models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review