Cited by 51Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionFace Recognition and Perception

Evidence that makeup is a false signal of sociosexuality

Batres, Carlota, Russell, Richard, Simpson, Jeffry A., Campbell, Lorne, Hansen, Alison M., Cronk, Lee·2018·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batres, C., Russell, R., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., Hansen, A. M., & Cronk, L.
Affiliations
  • Gettysburg College (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Batres, Carlota
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
122
Pages
148-154
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765492724
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College (Gettysburg College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
makeup, sociosexuality, facial attractiveness, sexual signals, women, self-perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review