CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 94

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Greedy bastards: Testing the relationship between wanting more and unethical behavior

Seuntjens, Terri G., Zeelenberg, Marcel, van de Ven, Niels, Breugelmans, Seger M.·2019·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.027
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Barnes, 2011, Lack of sleep and unethical conduct, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 169, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baumeister, 2015, Role of self-control failure in immoral and unethical actions, Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 66, 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.04.001 · DOI
  3. Caudil, 1988, How to recognize and deter employee theft, Personnel Administrator, 337, 86
  4. Chen, 2018, An evolutionary life history approach to understanding greed, Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 74, 10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.006 · DOI
  5. Cohen, 2009, Do groups lie more than individuals? Honesty and deception as a function of strategic self-interest, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1321, 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.007 · DOI
  6. Crusius, 2012, When people want what others have: The impulsive side of envious desire, Emotion, 12, 142, 10.1037/a0023523 · DOI
  7. Detert, 2008, Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 374, 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374 · DOI
  8. Frank, 2000, Does economics make citizens corrupt?, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43, 101, 10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00111-6 · DOI
  9. Gino, 2009, The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 142, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.003 · DOI
  10. Gino, 2011, Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 191, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.001 · DOI
  11. Haynes, 2017, When more is not enough: Executive greed and its influence on shareholder wealth, Journal of Management, 43, 555, 10.1177/0149206314535444 · DOI
  12. Haynes, 2014, The dark side of leadership: Towards a midrange theory of hubris and greed in entrepreneurial contexts, Journal of Management Studies, 52, 479, 10.1111/joms.12127 · DOI
  13. Hoch, 1991, Time inconsistent preferences and consumer selfcontrol, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 492, 10.1086/208573 · DOI
  14. Kouchaki, 2013, Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business frame and unethical outcomes, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 53, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.12.002 · DOI
  15. Krekels, 2015, Dispositional greed, Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 225, 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.036 · DOI
  16. Liu, 2019, Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Dispositional Greed Scale and a portrait of greedy people, Personality and Individual Differences, 137, 101, 10.1016/j.paid.2018.08.012 · DOI
  17. Masui, 2018, The development of the Japanese version of the Dispositional Greed Scale, Japanese Journal of Psychology, 88, 566, 10.4992/jjpsy.88.16240 · DOI
  18. Mussel, 2016, The life and times of individuals scoring high and low ondispositional greed, Journal of Research in Personality, 64, 52, 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.07.002 · DOI
  19. Mussel, 2015, State- and trait-greed, its impact on risky decision-making and underlying neural mechanisms, Social Neuroscience, 10, 126, 10.1080/17470919.2014.965340 · DOI
  20. Mussel, 2018, The convergent validity of five dispositional greed scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 249, 10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.006 · DOI
  21. Oka, 2014, Introducing an inquiry into the social economies of greed and excess, Economic Anthropology, 1, 1, 10.1002/sea2.12000 · DOI
  22. Piff, 2012, Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 4086, 10.1073/pnas.1118373109 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Poppe, 1986, Effects of greed and fear on being gypped in a social dilemma situation with changing pool size, Journal of Economic Psychology, 7, 61, 10.1016/0167-4870(86)90012-7 · DOI
  24. Preacher, 2008, Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879, 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Schweitzer, 2004, Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior, Academy of Management Journal, 47, 422, 10.2307/20159591 · DOI
  26. Seuntjens, 2016, Greed and adolescent financial behavior, Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 1, 10.1016/j.joep.2016.09.002 · DOI
  27. Seuntjens, 2015, Defining greed, British Journal of Psychology, 106, 505, 10.1111/bjop.12100 · DOI
  28. Seuntjens, 2015, Dispositional greed, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 917, 10.1037/pspp0000031 · DOI
  29. Steinel, 2004, Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 419, 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.419 · DOI
  30. Trautmann, 2013, Social class and (un)ethical behavior: A framework, with evidence from a large population sample, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 487, 10.1177/1745691613491272 · DOI
  31. Veselka, 2014, The Dark Triad and the seven deadly sins, Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 75, 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.055 · DOI
  32. Vrabel, 2018, Pathological personality traits and immoral tendencies, Personality and Individual Differences, 10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.043 · DOI
  33. Wang, 2011, Economics education and greed, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 643, 10.5465/amle.2009.0185 · DOI
  34. Wang, 2011, On greed, Academy of Management Annals, 5, 279, 10.5465/19416520.2011.588822 · DOI
  35. Wang, 2014, The social and ethical consequences of a calculative mindset, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 39, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seuntjens, T. G., Zeelenberg, M., van de Ven, N., & Breugelmans, S. M.
ORCID
Zeelenberg, Marcel
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
138
Pages
147-156
ISSN
0191-8869
DOI
10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.027
Cited by
94
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Nibud

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review