The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insecure attachment and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis of actor and partner associations
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, meta-analyses and a machine learning study have consistently shown that associations between a person’s experience and their own outcomes are stronger than the ones between a person’s experience and their partner’s outcomes (Candel & Turliuc, 2019; Joel et al., 2020).”
From Partner Effects of Childhood Maltreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Candel & Turliuc, 2019
In the citing paper
“Attachment insecurity has been associated with negative behaviors during conflict and decreased relationship satisfaction.”
In the citing paper
“the findings on avoidant attachment mirror those on human-human relationship development, which found individuals with avoidant attachment styles to have difficulties forming and maintaining intimate relationships (Simpson, 1990;Candel & Turliuc, 2019).”
From Understanding Human-Chatbot Romance: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study on Romantic Fantasy and Other Interpersonal Characteristics (2025) · cites this paper as Candel & Turliuc, 2019
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.12 · Cited by 6,793
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 · Cited by 6,247
Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226 · Cited by 6,009
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-1841 · Cited by 5,386
Attachment in adulthood: structure, dynamics, and change
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-2903 · Cited by 4,303
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Girme, Y. U., Park, Y., & MacDonald, G. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221136119 · Cited by 141
Transition to Parenthood and Marital Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis
Bogdan, I.-M., Turliuc, M., & Candel, O. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901362 · Cited by 90
Self-citationBröning, S., & Wartberg, L. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106996 · Cited by 63
MacDonald, G., & Park, Y. (2021) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/pere.12416 · Cited by 69
Debrot, A., Stellar, J. E., MacDonald, G., Keltner, D., & Impett, E. A. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220977709 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Candel, O.-S., & Turliuc, M. N.
- Affiliations
- Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO)
- Corresponding author
- Turliuc, Maria Nicoleta
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 147
- Pages
- 190-199
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2944391063
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- insecure attachment, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, relationship satisfaction, actor-partner effects, romantic relationships, attachment styles, relationship duration, relationship status
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
