The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of perioperative administration of gabapentin, rofecoxib and their combination for spontaneous and movement-evoked pain after abdominal hysterectomy
Abstract
Current treatments for post-injury movement-evoked pain are inadequate. Non-opioids may complement opioids, which preferentially reduce spontaneous pain, but most have incomplete efficacy as single agents. This trial evaluates efficacy of a gabapentin-rofecoxib combination following hysterectomy. In addition to IV-PCA morphine, 110 patients received either placebo, gabapentin (1800 mg/day), rofecoxib (50 mg/day) or a gabapentin-rofecoxib combination (1800/50 mg/day) starting 1 h pre-operatively for 72 h. Outcomes included pain at rest, evoked by sitting, peak expiration and cough, morphine consumption and peak expiratory flow (PEF). For placebo, gabapentin, rofecoxib and combination, 24 h pain (100 mm VAS) was: at rest-23.6 (P<0.05 vs. all treatments), 13.8, 14.4 and 12.1; during cough-50.7 (P<0.05 vs. all treatments), 41.5, 44.8 and 30.8; 48 h morphine consumption (mg) was: 130.4 (P<0.05 vs. all treatments), 81.7, 75.6 and 57.2 (P<0.05 vs. gabapentin and rofecoxib) and 48 h PEF (% baseline) was: 63.9 (P<0.05 vs. all treatments), 77.2, 76.7 and 87.5 (P<0.05 vs. gabapentin and rofecoxib). Adverse effects were similar in all groups except sedation which was more frequent with gabapentin. Combination and rofecoxib reduced pain interference with movement, mood and sleep (P<0.05) and combination was superior to gabapentin for all these three (P<0.05). These data suggest that a gabapentin-rofecoxib combination is superior to either single agent for postoperative pain. Other benefits include opioid sparing, reduced interference with movement, mood and sleep and increased PEF suggesting accelerated pulmonary recovery. Future research should identify optimal dose-ratios for this and other analgesic combinations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Opioid Complications and Side Effects
Benyamin, R. (2008) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2008/11/s105 · Cited by 2,245
Tiippana, E. M., Hamunen, K., Kontinen, V. K., & Kalso, E. (2007) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000261517.27532.80 · Cited by 532
Postamputation pain: epidemiology, mechanisms, and treatment
Cohen, S., & Hsu (2013) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s32299 · Cited by 372
Gabapentin: a multimodal perioperative drug?
Kong, V. K. F., & Irwin, M. G. (2007) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aem316 · Cited by 263
Durmus, M., Kadir But, A., Saricicek, V., Ilksen Toprak, H., & Ozcan Ersoy, M. (2007) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01237.x · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilron, I., Orr, E., Tu, D., O'Neill, P. J., Zamora, J. E., & Bell, A. C.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-200
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048761708
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of perioperative administration of gabapentin, rofecoxib and their combination for spontaneous and movement-evoked pain after abdominal hysterectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2004.10.008
- The paper
- Gilron, I., Orr, E., Tu, D., O'Neill, P. J., Zamora, J. E., & Bell, A. C. (2005). A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of perioperative administration of gabapentin, rofecoxib and their combination for spontaneous and movement-evoked pain after abdominal hysterectomy. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.10.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.