Parent and family factors in pediatric chronic pain and disability: An integrative approach
Abstract
aDepartments of Anesthesiology and Peri-Operative Medicine and Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA bDepartments of Pediatrics and Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada *Corresponding author. Address: Department of Anesthesiology and Peri-Operative Medicine, UHS-2 Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd. Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA. Tel.: +1 503 494 0848; fax: +1 503 494 4518. E-mail address:[email protected] Submitted October 21, 2005; accepted October 31, 2005.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to Palermo and Chambers, family influences on pediatric chronic pain operate at several levels: individual factors (parenting style, parental protective responses), dyadic influences (parent-child relationship), and family level variables (family environment).
“According to the model described by Palermo and Chambers (2), family influences on pediatric chronic pain operate at several levels, from individual factors, such as parenting style or parental protective responses to pain, through dyadic influences such as the parent-child relationship, to family level variables such as the family environment.”
From Ecological system influences in the treatment of pediatric chronic pain (2012) · cites this paper as [2]
Each of these family factors both influence and are influenced by pain and functional disability, with outcomes modulated by child characteristics, emotional distress, and pain coping abilities.
“Each of these specific factors both influence and are influenced by pain and functional disability, with the ultimate outcomes of the chronic pain experience often modulated by other factors such as the child's characteristics, emotional distress and pain coping abilities.”
From Ecological system influences in the treatment of pediatric chronic pain (2012) · cites this paper as [2]
Family, school and the peer network each shape the pain experience of the individual child or adolescent, and each also represents a domain of functioning that is often impaired by chronic pain.
“Family, school and the peer network each shape the pain experience of the individual child or adolescent, and each also represents a domain of functioning that is often impaired by chronic pain.”
From Ecological system influences in the treatment of pediatric chronic pain (2012) · cites this paper as [2]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 17 · Cited by 384
- Authors
- Palermo, T. M., & Chambers, C. T.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 1-4
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018790077
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
- Keywords
- pediatric chronic pain, disability, parental factors, family factors, integrated approach
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Child, Child, Preschool, Disability Evaluation, Humans, Pain, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Pediatrics, United States, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
