The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gabapentin and postoperative pain – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of perioperative gabapentin administration for the control of acute postoperative pain. We searched Medline (1966-2006), the Cochrane Library (2006), Scopus, CINAHL and bibliographies from clinical trials and review articles. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing gabapentin with inactive controls in surgical patients. Sixteen valid RCTs were included. Weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative pain intensity (0-100 mm visual analogue scale) was -16.55 mm at 6 h and -10.87 mm at 24 h for treatment with a single preoperative dose of gabapentin 1200 mg. Cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h was also significantly decreased with gabapentin (WMD, -27.90 mg). When gabapentin was administered at doses less than 1200 mg, pain intensity was also lower at 6 h (WMD, -22.43 mm) and 24 h (WMD, -13.18 mm). Cumulative 24 h opioid consumption was also lower (WMD, -7.25 mg). Gabapentin was associated with an increased risk of sedation (Peto OR 3.86; 95% CI 2.50-5.94) but less opioid-related side effects such as vomiting (Peto OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.39-0.86) and pruritus (Peto OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.10-0.74). In conclusion, gabapentin has an analgesic and opioid-sparing effect in acute postoperative pain management when used in conjunction with opioids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826
Fassoulaki, A., Triga, A., Melemeni, A., & Sarantopoulos, C. (2005) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000180200.11626.8e · Cited by 255
Cited by
Waldron, N. H., Jones, C. A., Gan, T. J., Allen, T. K., & Habib, A. S. (2013) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aes431 · Cited by 659
Self-citationClarke, H., Bonin, R. P., Orser, B. A., Englesakis, M., Wijeysundera, D. N., & Katz, J. (2012) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e318249d36e · Cited by 481
Efficacy of pregabalin in acute postoperative pain: a meta-analysis
Zhang, J., Ho, K.-Y., & Wang, Y. (2011) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aer027 · Cited by 357
Self-citationMaurice-Szamburski, A., Auquier, P., Viarre-Oreal, V., Cuvillon, P., Carles, M., Ripart, J., Honore, S., Triglia, T., Loundou, A., Leone, M., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1108 · Cited by 212
Martinez, V., Pichard, X., & Fletcher, D. (2017) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000838 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Ho, K.-Y., Gan, T. J., & Habib, A. S.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-101
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082927421
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gabapentin and postoperative pain – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.018
- The paper
- Ho, K.-Y., Gan, T. J., & Habib, A. S. (2006). Gabapentin and postoperative pain – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.