Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence rates and treatment of neuropathic pain conditions in the general population ☆

Dieleman, Jeanne P., Kerklaan, Joost, Huygen, Frank J.P.M., Bouma, Paul A.D., Sturkenboom, Miriam C.J.M.·2008·Pain

Abstract

Incidence rate estimates of neuropathic pain are scanty and mostly address single types whereas the scope of the disease is wide. We aimed to calculate the incidence rates of neuropathic pain conditions in the Dutch general population and to assess treatment strategies in primary care. The study population included persons registered for at least one year in the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) database between 1996 and 2003. Neuropathic pain was ascertained and classified by systematic review of computerized longitudinal medical records. Incidence rates (IR) were calculated, and the treatment for pain was compared to age and gender matched controls. Among 362,693 persons contributing 1,116,215 person years (PY), we identified 9135 new cases of neuropathic pain (IR: 8.2/1000 PY, 95%CI: 8.0-8.4). Mononeuropathy and carpal tunnel syndrome were the most frequent types with 4.3 and 2.3 cases/1000 PY followed by diabetic peripheral neuropathy and post-herpetic neuralgia at 0.72 and 0.42/1000 PY. Neuropathic pain was 63% more common in women than in men and peaked between the ages 70 and 79. More than 50% of cases received pain medication within 6 months after diagnosis, mostly consisting of NSAIDs or aspirin. Anticonvulsants and tricyclic antidepressants were only used by 4.8 and 4.7% of cases. Neuropathic pain is a rather frequent condition with an annual incidence of almost 1% of the general population and affecting women and middle-aged persons more often. The treatment mostly consisted of regular analgesics suggesting that pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain is suboptimal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2008.03.002

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Nordstrom, 1998, Incidence of diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population., Epidemiology, 9, 342, 10.1097/00001648-199805000-00021 · doi:10.1097/00001648-199805000-00021
  2. Rossignol, 1997, Carpal tunnel syndrome: what is attributable to work? The Montreal study., Occup Environ Med, 54, 519, 10.1136/oem.54.7.519 · doi:10.1136/oem.54.7.519
  3. Stevens, 1988, Carpal tunnel syndrome in Rochester, Minnesota, 1961 to 1980., Neurology, 38, 134, 10.1212/WNL.38.1.134 · doi:10.1212/wnl.38.1.134

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Dieleman, J. P., Kerklaan, J., Huygen, F. J. P. M., Bouma, P. A. D., & Sturkenboom, M. C. J. M.
Venue
Pain
Published
2008-07-31
Volume
137
Issue
3
Pages
681-688
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094162828
Cited by
353
References
29
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence rates and treatment of neuropathic pain conditions in the general population ☆. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2008.03.002
The paper
Dieleman, J. P., Kerklaan, J., Huygen, F. J. P. M., Bouma, P. A. D., & Sturkenboom, M. C. J. M. (2008). Incidence rates and treatment of neuropathic pain conditions in the general population ☆. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.03.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.