The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How the number of learning trials affects placebo and nocebo responses
Open accessAbstract
Conditioning procedures are used in many placebo studies because evidence suggests that conditioning-related placebo responses are usually more robust than those induced by verbal suggestions alone. However, it has not been shown whether there is a causal relation between the number of conditioning trials and the resistance to extinction of placebo and nocebo responses. Here we test the effects of either one or four sessions of conditioning on the modulation of both non-painful and painful stimuli delivered to the dorsum of the foot. Placebo and nocebo manipulations were obtained by pairing green or red light to a series of stimuli that were made lower or higher with respect to a yellow light associated with a series of control stimuli. Subjects were told that the lights would indicate a treatment that would reduce or increase non-painful and painful stimuli to the foot. They were randomly assigned to either Group 1 or 2. Group 1 underwent one session of conditioning and Group 2 received four sessions of conditioning. We found that one session of conditioning (Group 1) induced nocebo responses, but not placebo responses in no pain condition. After one session of conditioning, we observed both nocebo and placebo responses to painful stimulation. However, these effects extinguished over time. Conversely, four sessions of conditioning (Group 2) induced robust placebo and nocebo responses to both non-painful and painful stimuli that persisted over the entire experiment. These findings suggest that the strength of learning may be clinically important for producing long-lasting placebo effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most of these studies have involved behavioral measures only (Benedetti et al., 2014; Benedetti et al., 2003; Colloca et al., 2010; Colloca et al., 2008).”
From Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects (2015) · cites this paper as Colloca et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“To date, only a few studies have directly compared placebo and nocebo effects.”
From Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects (2015) · cites this paper as Colloca et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“Nonspecific and potentially confounding variables, such as conditioning effects, psychosocial contexts, facilitator attention, intervention setting, body posture, and/or demand characteristics associated with the belief that one is practicing meditation,15, 27, 135 could mediate mindfulness meditation–related health improvements.136, 137”
From Mindfulness meditation-based pain relief: a mechanistic account (2016) · cites this paper as [136]
In the citing paper
“Indeed, negative expectations that are induced by the medical staff also lead to the formation of nocebo effects.15,31”
From Nocebo and pain: an overview of the psychoneurobiological mechanisms (2017) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“These findings well fit with the notion that optimism and anxiety modulate nocebo, as well as placebo, responses12252641.”
From Changes in perception of treatment efficacy are associated to the magnitude of the nocebo effect and to personality traits (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, in a previous study in the context of pain, a correlation was found between nocebo responses and both anxiety scales (state and trait)12, supporting the link between anxiety and the nocebo effect.”
From Changes in perception of treatment efficacy are associated to the magnitude of the nocebo effect and to personality traits (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Selective Cortical Undercutting As a Means of Modifying and Studying Frontal Lobe Function in Man
Scoville, W. B. (1949) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1949.6.1.0065 · Cited by 7,374
Rescorla, R. A. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,268
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,712
Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.
Black, A. H., & Prokasy, W. F. (1972) · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks · Cited by 4,449
Placebo-Induced Changes in fMRI in the Anticipation and Experience of Pain
Wager, T. D., Rilling, J. K., Smith, E. E., Sokolik, A., Casey, K. L., Davidson, R. J., Kosslyn, S. M., Rose, R. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093065 · Cited by 1,992
Self-citationPavlovian conditioning: it's not what you think it is
Rescorla, R. A. (1988) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.43.3.151 · Cited by 1,542
A Comprehensive Review of the Placebo Effect: Recent Advances and Current Thought
Price, D. D., Finniss, D. G., & Benedetti, F. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.113006.095941 · Cited by 1,146
Self-citationConditioned Aversion to Saccharin Resulting from Exposure to Gamma Radiation
García, J., Kimeldorf, D. J., & Koelling, R. A. (1955) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.122.3160.157 · Cited by 1,011
Expectation and Dopamine Release: Mechanism of the Placebo Effect in Parkinson's Disease
de la Fuente‐Fernández, R., Ruth, T. J., Sossi, V., Schulzer, M., Calne, D. B., & Stoessl, A. J. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060937 · Cited by 991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
(2020) · doi:10.1056/nejmra1907805 · Cited by 634
Self-citationPlacebo Analgesia: A Predictive Coding Perspective
Büchel, C., Geuter, S., Sprenger, C., & Eippert, F. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.042 · Cited by 505
The Nocebo Effect and Its Relevance for Clinical Practice
Colloca, L., & Miller, F. G. (2011) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3182294a50 · Cited by 454
Self-citationFear is only as deep as the mind allows
Diekhof, E. K., Geier, K., Falkai, P., & Gruber, O. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.073 · Cited by 413
Zeidan, F., Emerson, N. M., Farris, S. R., Ray, J. N., Jung, Y., McHaffie, J. G., & Coghill, R. C. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2542-15.2015 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Colloca, L., Petrovic, P., Wager, T. D., Ingvar, M., & Benedetti, F.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- University of Turin (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Colloca, Luana
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 430-439
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2955814
- OpenAlex
- W2163724593
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- International Association for the Study of Pain
- National Institutes of Health (Z99 AT999999)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- placebo response, nocebo effect, classical conditioning, extinction, pain perception, foot dorsum, verbal suggestion
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Conditioning, Psychological, Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Photic Stimulation, Placebos, Psychological Tests, Psychophysics, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors, Placebo Effect, Pain Threshold, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
