Cited by 165Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

Randomized control trial of topical clonidine for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy

Open access
Campbell, Claudia M., Kipnes, Mark S., Stouch, Bruce C., Brady, Kerrie L., Kelly, Margaret, Schmidt, William K., Petersen, Karin L., Rowbotham, Michael C. +1 more·2012·Pain

Abstract

A length-dependent neuropathy with pain in the feet is a common complication of diabetes (painful diabetic neuropathy). It was hypothesized that pain may arise from sensitized-hyperactive cutaneous nociceptors, and that this abnormal signaling may be reduced by topical administration of the α(2)-adrenergic agonist, clonidine, to the painful area. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Nociceptor function was measured by determining the painfulness of 0.1% topical capsaicin applied to the pretibial area of each subject for 30minutes during screening. Subjects were then randomized to receive 0.1% topical clonidine gel (n=89) or placebo gel (n=90) applied 3 times a day to their feet for 12weeks. The difference in foot pain at week 12 in relation to baseline, rated on a 0-10 numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), was compared between groups. Baseline NPRS was imputed for missing data for subjects who terminated the study early. The subjects treated with clonidine showed a trend toward decreased foot pain compared to the placebo-treated group (the primary endpoint; P=0.07). In subjects who felt any level of pain to capsaicin, clonidine was superior to placebo (P<0.05). In subjects with a capsaicin pain rating ⩾2 (0-10, NPRS), the mean decrease in foot pain was 2.6 for active compared to 1.4 for placebo (P=0.01). Topical clonidine gel significantly reduces the level of foot pain in painful diabetic neuropathy subjects with functional (and possibly sensitized) nociceptors in the affected skin as revealed by testing with topical capsaicin. Screening for cutaneous nociceptor function may help distinguish candidates for topical therapy for neuropathic pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2012.04.014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Placebo response is higher in HIV-related neuropathies and in patients with low or variable baseline pain scores, and lower in postherpetic neuralgia.

    “Placebo response has been found to be higher in HIV-related neuropathies,45 and in patients with low or variable pain scores at inclusion.52 Conversely it seems to be lower in postherpetic neuralgia.45”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 165

Authors
Campbell, C. M., Kipnes, M. S., Stouch, B. C., Brady, K. L., Kelly, M., Schmidt, W. K., Petersen, K. L., Rowbotham, M. C., & Campbell, J. N.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic (US)
  • TauRx (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Claudia M.
Venue
Pain
Published
2012-09
Volume
153
Issue
9
Pages
1815-1823
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968607405
Cited by
165
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS070933)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Keywords
diabetic neuropathic pain, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, cutaneous nociceptors, nociceptor sensitization, neuropathic pain, topical gel
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Aged, Analgesics, Capsaicin, Clonidine, Diabetic Neuropathies, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nociceptors, Pain Measurement, Treatment Outcome, Sensory System Agents, Nociceptive Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review