Cited by 375Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

An efficient randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial with the irreversible fatty acid amide hydrolase-1 inhibitor PF-04457845, which modulates endocannabinoids but fails to induce effective analgesia in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee

Huggins, John P., Smart, Trevor S., Langman, Stephen, Taylor, Louise, Young, Tim·2012·Pain

Abstract

The effect of PF-04457845, a potent and selective fatty acid amide hydrolase-1 (FAAH1) inhibitor, on pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee was investigated in a randomised placebo and active-controlled clinical trial. The trial involved 2 periods (separated by a 2-week washout) consisting of a 1-week wash-in phase followed by 2weeks double-blind treatment. Patients received single-blind placebo throughout the wash-in and washout periods. Patients were randomised to receive either 4mg q.d. PF-04457845 followed by placebo (or vice versa), or 500mg b.i.d. naproxen followed by placebo (or vice versa). The primary end point was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score. The trial had predefined decision rules based on likelihood that PF-04457845 was better or worse than the standard of care (considered to be a 1.8 reduction in WOMAC pain score compared to placebo). A total of 74 patients were randomised to 1 of 4 treatment sequences. The mean differences (80% confidence intervals) from placebo in WOMAC pain score were 0.04 (-0.63 to 0.71) for PF-04457845 and -1.13 (-1.79 to -0.47) for naproxen, indicating that whilst naproxen seemed efficacious, PF-04457845 was not differentiated from placebo. The study was stopped at the interim analysis for futility. PF-04457845 decreased FAAH activity by >96% and substantially increased 4 endogenous substrates (fatty acid amides). PF-04457845 was well tolerated in osteoarthritis patients, and there was no evidence of cannabinoid-type adverse events. The lack of analgesic effect of FAAH1 inhibition in humans is in contrast to data from animal models. This apparent disconnect between species needs further study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2012.04.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 375

Authors
Huggins, J. P., Smart, T. S., Langman, S., Taylor, L., & Young, T.
Affiliations
Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Huggins, John P.
Venue
Pain
Published
2012-09
Volume
153
Issue
9
Pages
1837-1846
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982429227
Cited by
375
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 5
FWCI
23.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
endocannabinoids, knee osteoarthritis, osteoarthritis pain, analgesia, naproxen, WOMAC pain score, futility, fatty acid amides, drug tolerability
MeSH terms
Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolases, Adult, Aged, Amidohydrolases, Analgesics, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Middle Aged, Naproxen, Pain Measurement, Pyridazines, Urea, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Medical Futility, Cross-Over Studies, Arthralgia, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review