Guidelines for the understanding and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis
Open accessAbstract
Abdominal pain is the foremost complication of chronic pancreatitis (CP). Pain can be related to recurrent or chronic inflammation, local complications or neurogenic mechanisms with corresponding changes in the nervous systems. Both pain intensity and the frequency of pain attacks have been shown to reduce quality of life in patients with CP. Assessment of pain follows the guidelines for other types of chronic pain, where the multidimensional nature of symptom presentation is taken into consideration. Quantitative sensory testing may be used to characterize pain, but is currently used in a research setting in advanced laboratories. For pain relief, current guidelines recommend a simple stepwise escalation of analgesic drugs with increasing potency until pain relief is obtained. Abstinence from alcohol and smoking should be strongly advised. Pancreatic enzyme therapy and antioxidants may be helpful as initial treatment. Endoscopic treatment can be used in patients with evidence of ductal obstruction and may be combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithothripsy. The best candidates are those with distal obstruction of the main pancreatic duct and in early stage of disease. Behavioral interventions should be part of the multidisciplinary approach to chronic pain management particularly when psychological impact is experienced. Surgery should be considered early and after a maximum of five endoscopic interventions. The type of surgery depends on morphological changes of the pancreas. Long-term effects are variable, but high success rates have been reported in open studies and when compared with endoscopic treatment. Finally, neurolytical interventions and neuromodulation can be considered in difficult patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent guidelines encourage the use of behavioral interventions as part of a multidisciplinary approach to managing painful CP.
“Recent guidelines encourage the use of behavioral interventions as part of a multidisciplinary approach to managing painful CP (8).”
From Internet Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Painful Chronic Pancreatitis: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 132 · Cited by 321
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- N Engl J Med 2007 Feb 15;356(7):676e84. Available from:, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17301298.
- Suzuki Y, Sugiyama M, Inui K, Igarashi Y, Ohara H, Tazuma S, et al. Man- agement for pancreatolithiasis: a Japanese multicenter study [cited 2017 Mar 8] Pancreas 2013 May;42(4):584e8. Available from:, http://content. wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid¼WKPTLP:landingpage&an¼00006676- 201305000-00004.
- J R Coll Surg Edinb 1994 Feb;39(1):44e7. Available from:, http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7515430.
- Authors
- Drewes, A. M., Bouwense, S. A. W., Campbell, C. M., Ceyhan, G. O., Delhaye, M., Demir, I. E., Garg, P. K., van Goor, H., Halloran, C., Isaji, S., Neoptolemos, J. P., Olesen, S. S., Palermo, T., Pasricha, P. J., Sheel, A., Shimosegawa, T., Szigethy, E., Whitcomb, D. C., & Yadav, D.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Erasmus Hospital (BE)
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Mie University (JP)
- Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
- Tohoku University (JP)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Drewes, Asbjørn M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Pancreatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 720-731
- ISSN
- 1424-3903 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2735030519
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Pancreatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK073558)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- chronic pancreatitis, abdominal pain, pain management, pain assessment, quantitative sensory testing, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, antioxidants, endoscopic treatment, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, pancreatic duct obstruction, behavioral interventions, pancreatic surgery, neuromodulation, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Pain, Pain Measurement, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pancreatitis, Chronic, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review