Learning and consolidation of visuo-motor adaptation in Parkinson's disease
Open accessAbstract
We have previously shown in normal subjects that motor adaptation to imposed visual rotation is significantly enhanced when tested few days later. This occurs through a process of sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Here we ascertained whether patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) learn, improve, and retain new motor skills in the same way as normal subjects. We tested 16 patients in early stages of PD and 21 control subjects over two days. All subjects performed reaching movements on a digitizing tablet. Vision of the limb was precluded with an opaque screen; hand paths were shown on the screen with the targets' position. Unbeknownst to the subjects, the hand path on the screen was rotated by 30 degrees . In experiment 1, patients taking dopaminergic treatment and controls adapted to rotation with targets appearing in an unpredictable order. In experiment 2, drug-naïve patients and controls adapted to rotation in a less challenging task where target's appearance was predictable. Patients and controls made similar movements and adapted to rotation in the same way. However, when tested again over the following days, controls' performance significantly improved compared to training, while patients' performance did not. This lack of consolidation, which is present in the early stages of the disease and is independent from therapy, may be due to abnormal homeostatic processes that occur during sleep.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Initial learning in patients with PD would be expected to proceed as in controls.
“Numerous studies suggest that adaptation is dependent on the cerebellum (Martin et al., 1996a, b; Smith and Shadmehr, 2005; Tseng et al., 2007), a structure unaffected in Parkinson's disease (PD), and therefore initial learning in patients with PD would be expected to proceed as in controls – as indeed was recently demonstrated (Bedard and Sanes, 2011; Marinelli et al., 2009).”
From Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models (2011) · cites this paper as Marinelli et al., 2009
Patients with PD show a selective savings deficit in an error-based motor learning paradigm: they adapt to initial rotation as well as control subjects but do not show savings.
“This is exactly what has been found: patients with PD were able to adapt to initial rotation as well as control subjects but they did not show savings (Bedard and Sanes, 2011; Marinelli et al., 2009).”
From Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models (2011) · cites this paper as Marinelli et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 129
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [26]Elliott T, Ghilardi MF, Mazzoni P, Ghez C. Time course of learning and generalization differ among visuomotor transformations of reaching movements. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 2000;26:179. [Google Scholar]
- Authors
- Marinelli, L., Crupi, D., Di Rocco, A., Bove, M., Eidelberg, D., Abbruzzese, G., & Ghilardi, M. F.
- Affiliations
- City University of New York (US)
- University of Genoa (IT)
- Venue
- Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-11
- ISSN
- 1353-8020 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2656368
- OpenAlex
- W2057012778
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Parkinsonism & Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- National Parkinson Foundation
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS055185, R01NS054864)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, visuomotor adaptation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Association Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Movement, Neuropsychological Tests, Orientation, Parkinson Disease, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Dopamine Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review