Impaired resting vagal tone in patients with functional movement disorders
Open accessAbstract
Introduction The autonomic nervous system plays an integral role in the maintenance of homeostasis during times of stress. The functioning of the autonomic nervous system in patients with functional movement disorders (FMD) is of particular interest given the hypothesis that converted psychological stress plays a critical role in FMD disease pathogenesis. We sought to investigate autonomic nervous system activity in FMD patients by examining heart rate variability (HRV), a quantitative marker of autonomic function. Methods 35 clinically definite FMD patients and 38 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were hospitalized overnight for continuous electrocardiogram recording. Standard time and frequency domain measures of HRV were calculated in the awake and asleep stages. All participants underwent a thorough neuropsychological battery, including the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scales and the Beck Depression Inventory. Results Compared to controls, patients with FMD exhibited decreased root mean square of successive differences between adjacent NN intervals (RMSSD) (p = 0.02), a marker of parasympathetic activity, as well as increased mean heart rate (p = 0.03). These measures did not correlate with the depression and anxiety scores included in our assessment as potential covariates. Conclusion In this exploratory study, patients with FMD showed evidence of impaired resting state vagal tone, as demonstrated by reduced RMSSD. This decreased vagal tone may reflect increased stress vulnerability in patients with FMD.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Maurer, C. W., Liu, V. D., LaFaver, K., Ameli, R., Wu, T., Toledo, R., Epstein, S. A., & Hallett, M.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maurer, Carine W.
- Liu, Victoria D.
- LaFaver, Kathrin
- Ameli, Rezvan
- Wu, Tianxia
- Toledo, Ryan
- Epstein, Steven A.
- Hallett, Mark
- Venue
- Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 18-22
- ISSN
- 1353-8020 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5007207
- OpenAlex
- W2430453425
- Semantic Scholar
- adf4e498445c610e6b927376ad5988da22670553
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Parkinsonism & Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NINDS Intramural Program
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Keywords
- functional movement disorders, vagal tone
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Autonomic Nervous System, Depressive Disorder, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement Disorders, Rest, Stress, Psychological, Vagus Nerve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review