The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer-aided evaluation of neuroblastoma on whole-slide histology images: Classifying grade of neuroblastic differentiation
Open accessAbstract
Neuroblastoma (NB) is one of the most frequently occurring cancerous tumors in children. The current grading evaluations for patients with this disease require pathologists to identify certain morphological characteristics with microscopic examinations of tumor tissues. Thanks to the advent of modern digital scanners, it is now feasible to scan cross-section tissue specimens and acquire whole-slide digital images. As a result, computerized analysis of these images can generate key quantifiable parameters and assist pathologists with grading evaluations. In this study, image analysis techniques are applied to histological images of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides for identifying image regions associated with different pathological components. Texture features derived from segmented components of tissues are extracted and processed by an automated classifier group trained with sample images with different grades of neuroblastic differentiation in a multi-resolution framework. The trained classification system is tested on 33 whole-slide tumor images. The resulting whole-slide classification accuracy produced by the computerized system is 87.88%. Therefore, the developed system is a promising tool to facilitate grading whole-slide images of NB biopsies with high throughput.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Hansen, L. K., & Salamon, P. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.58871 · Cited by 4,260
Cited by
Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review
Gurcan, M. N., Boucheron, L. E., Can, A., Madabhushi, A., Rajpoot, N. M., & Yener, B. (2009) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2009.2034865 · Cited by 2,052
Self-citationA foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection
Vorontsov, E., Bozkurt, A., Casson, A., Shaikovski, G., Zelechowski, M., Severson, K., Zimmermann, E., Hall, J., Tenenholtz, N., Fusi, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03141-0 · Cited by 572
Doyle, S., Feldman, M., Tomaszewski, J., & Madabhushi, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2010.2053540 · Cited by 253
Constrained deep weak supervision for histopathology image segmentation
Jia, Z., Huang, X., Chang, E. I.-C., & Xu, Y. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2724070 · Cited by 242
Visual pattern mining in histology image collections using bag of features
Cruz-Roa, A., Caicedo, J. C., & González, F. A. (2011) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2011.04.010 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Kong, J., Sertel, O., Shimada, H., Boyer, K. L., Saltz, J. H., & Gurcan, M. N.
- Venue
- Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1080-1092
- ISSN
- 0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982390426
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer-aided evaluation of neuroblastoma on whole-slide histology images: Classifying grade of neuroblastic differentiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.patcog.2008.10.035
- The paper
- Kong, J., Sertel, O., Shimada, H., Boyer, K. L., Saltz, J. H., & Gurcan, M. N. (2009). Computer-aided evaluation of neuroblastoma on whole-slide histology images: Classifying grade of neuroblastic differentiation. Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2008.10.035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
