CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 68AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Breast mass classification via deeply integrating the contextual information from multi-view data

Wang, Hongyu, Feng, Jun, Zhang, Zizhao, Su, Hai, Cui, Lei, He, Hua, Liu, Li·2018·Pattern Recognition
DOI 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.026
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.026

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • X. Wang et al. (2018) showed a saliency map of the chest with multiple regions corresponding to different radiological findings.

    “They showed a saliency map of the chest with multiple regions corresponding to different radiological findings.”

    From Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis (2022) · cites this paper as X. Wang et al. (2018)

  • X. Wang et al. (2018) showed in a chest X-ray example that different parts of the textual explanation led to different areas of saliency mapping in the image.

    “X. Wang et al. (2018) used a similar approach, and showed in their chest X-ray example that different parts of the textual explanation led to different areas of saliency mapping in the image.”

    From Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis (2022) · cites this paper as X. Wang et al. (2018)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Chlebowski, 2003, Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the women’s health initiative randomized trial, JAMA, 289, 3243, 10.1001/jama.289.24.3243 · DOI
  2. Kooi, 2017, Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions, Med. Image Anal., 35, 303, 10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Dromain, 2013, Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer, Eur. J. Radiol., 82, 417, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.03.005 · DOI
  4. Agrawal, 2014, Saliency based mass detection from screening mammograms, Signal Process., 99, 29, 10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.010 · DOI
  5. Li, 2017, Large-scale retrieval for medical image analytics: a comprehensive review., Med. Image Anal., 43, 66, 10.1016/j.media.2017.09.007 · DOI
  6. Esteva, 2017, Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks, Nature, 542, 115, 10.1038/nature21056 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Qian, 2007, Computer-aided mass detection based on ipsilateral multiview mammograms, Acad. Radiol., 14, 530, 10.1016/j.acra.2007.01.012 · DOI
  8. Velikova, 2009, Improved mammographic cad performance using multi-view information: a Bayesian network framework, Phys. Med. Biol., 54, 1131, 10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/003 · DOI
  9. D. Lévy, A. Jain, Breast mass classification from mammograms using deep convolutional neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.00542, (2016). · arXiv
  10. Ramos-Pollán, 2012, Discovering mammography-based machine learning classifiers for breast cancer diagnosis, J. Med. Syst., 36, 2259, 10.1007/s10916-011-9693-2 · DOI
  11. Tsochatzidis, 2017, Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic masses based on a supervised content-based image retrieval approach, Pattern Recognit., 71, 106, 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.05.023 · DOI
  12. Li, 2016, Mass classification in mammograms based on two-concentric masks and discriminating texton, Pattern Recognit., 60, 648, 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.06.021 · DOI
  13. Liu, 2014, Mass classification in mammograms using selected geometry and texture features, and a new SVM-based feature selection method, IEEE Syst. J., 8, 910, 10.1109/JSYST.2013.2286539 · DOI
  14. Verma, 2009, A novel soft cluster neural network for the classification of suspicious areas in digital mammograms, Pattern Recognit., 42, 1845, 10.1016/j.patcog.2009.02.009 · DOI
  15. Arevalo, 2016, Representation learning for mammography mass lesion classification with convolutional neural networks, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 127, 248, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.12.014 · DOI
  16. Jiao, 2017, A parasitic metric learning net for breast mass classification based on mammography, Pattern Recognit., 75, 292, 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.07.008 · DOI
  17. Dhungel, 2017, A deep learning approach for the analysis of masses in mammograms with minimal user intervention, Med. Image Anal., 37, 114, 10.1016/j.media.2017.01.009 · DOI
  18. Zheng, 2009, Matching breast masses depicted on different views: a comparison of three methods, Acad. Radiol., 16, 1338, 10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.005 · DOI
  19. Liu, 2018, Multi-view multi-scale CNNs for lung nodule type classification from CT images, Pattern Recognit., 77, 262, 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.12.022 · DOI
  20. K.J. Geras, S. Wolfson, S. Kim, L. Moy, K. Cho, High-resolution breast cancer screening with multi-view deep convolutional neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07047, (2017). · arXiv
  21. N. Kalchbrenner, L. Espeholt, K. Simonyan, A.v. d. Oord, A. Graves, K. Kavukcuoglu, Neural machine translation in linear time, arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.10099, (2016). · arXiv
  22. Li, 2017, Accurate object detection using memory-based models in surveillance scenes, Pattern Recognit., 67, 73, 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.01.030 · DOI
  23. G. Litjens, T. Kooi, B.E. Bejnordi, A.A.A. Setio, F. Ciompi, M. Ghafoorian, J.A. van der Laak, B. van Ginneken, C.I. Sánchez, A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis, arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05747, (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Hong-Yu, 2016, Breast masses diagnosis based on a weighted ensemble framework for group semantic feature vectors (WeGav), J. Med. Imaging Health Inform., 6, 1761, 10.1166/jmihi.2016.1886 · DOI
  25. Andersson, 2008, Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings, Eur. Radiol., 18, 2817, 10.1007/s00330-008-1076-9 · DOI
  26. Aubreville, 2017, Automatic classification of cancerous tissue in laserendomicroscopy images of the oral cavity using deep learning, Sci. Rep., 7, 11979, 10.1038/s41598-017-12320-8 · DOI
  27. X. Wang, Y. Peng, L. Lu, Z. Lu, M. Bagheri, R.M. Summers, Chestx-ray8: hospital-scale chest x-ray database and benchmarks on weakly-supervised classification and localization of common thorax diseases, arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02315, (2017). · arXiv
  28. Arbelaez, 2011, Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 33, 898, 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.161 · DOI
  29. Xue, 2016, CNN-SVM for microvascular morphological type recognition with data augmentation, J. Med. Biol. Eng., 36, 755, 10.1007/s40846-016-0182-4 · DOI
  30. Xing, 2016, An automatic learning-based framework for robust nucleus segmentation, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 35, 550, 10.1109/TMI.2015.2481436 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, H., Feng, J., Zhang, Z., Su, H., Cui, L., He, H., & Liu, L.
Affiliations
  • Northwest University (CN)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Feng, Jun
  • Liu, Li
ORCID
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
80
Pages
42-52
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.026
OpenAlex
W2793701907
Cited by
68
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61701404, 81671648, 81727802)
  • Northwest University (YZZ15095)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Keywords
breast mass classification, mammography, benign vs malignant tumors, multi-view data, attention mechanism, recurrent neural networks, clinical data integration, interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review