Cited by 31Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)COVID-19 diagnosis using AIMachine Learning in Healthcare

Multimodal explainability via latent shift applied to COVID-19 stratification

Open access
Guarrasi, Valerio, Tronchin, Lorenzo, Albano, Domenico, Faiella, Eliodoro, Fazzini, Deborah, Santucci, Domiziana, Soda, Paolo·2024·Pattern Recognition

Abstract

We are witnessing a widespread adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare. However, most of the advancements in deep learning in this area consider only unimodal data, neglecting other modalities. Their multimodal interpretation necessary for supporting diagnosis, prognosis and treatment decisions. In this work we present a deep architecture, which jointly learns modality reconstructions and sample classifications using tabular and imaging data. The explanation of the decision taken is computed by applying a latent shift that, simulates a counterfactual prediction revealing the features of each modality that contribute the most to the decision and a quantitative score indicating the modality importance. We validate our approach in the context of COVID-19 pandemic using the AIforCOVID dataset, which contains multimodal data for the early identification of patients at risk of severe outcome. The results show that the proposed method provides meaningful explanations without degrading the classification performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110825

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 31

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [28][28] V. Guarrasi, et al., Optimized fusion of CNNs to diagnose pulmonary diseases on chest X-rays, in: International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, Springer, 2022, pp. 197-209. -
  2. [33][33] X. Glorot, et al., Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, in: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial - Intelligence and Statistics, JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2010, pp. 249-256. -
  3. [35][35] J. P. Cohen, et al., TorchXRayVision: A library of chest X-ray datasets and models, in: International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, PMLR, 2022, pp. 231-249. -

Authors
Guarrasi, V., Tronchin, L., Albano, D., Faiella, E., Fazzini, D., Santucci, D., & Soda, P.
Affiliations
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Ospedale Sant'Anna (IT)
  • Centro Diagnostico Italiano (IT)
Corresponding author
Soda, Paolo
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
156
Pages
110825
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400944124
Cited by
31
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Government of Italy Ministry of Education University and Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
counterfactual explanations, early risk detection, explainable deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review