Multimodal explainability via latent shift applied to COVID-19 stratification
Open accessAbstract
We are witnessing a widespread adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare. However, most of the advancements in deep learning in this area consider only unimodal data, neglecting other modalities. Their multimodal interpretation necessary for supporting diagnosis, prognosis and treatment decisions. In this work we present a deep architecture, which jointly learns modality reconstructions and sample classifications using tabular and imaging data. The explanation of the decision taken is computed by applying a latent shift that, simulates a counterfactual prediction revealing the features of each modality that contribute the most to the decision and a quantitative score indicating the modality importance. We validate our approach in the context of COVID-19 pandemic using the AIforCOVID dataset, which contains multimodal data for the early identification of patients at risk of severe outcome. The results show that the proposed method provides meaningful explanations without degrading the classification performance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Guarrasi et al. (2024) uses concatenated multimodal features to retrieve both unimodal and multimodal explanations.
“In one example, we observe a proposal for bespoke explainability modules for multimodal AI: Guarrasi et al. (2024) uses its (concatenated) multimodal features to retrieve both the unimodal and multimodal explanations.”
From Navigating the landscape of multimodal AI in medicine: A scoping review on technical challenges and clinical applications (2025) · cites this paper as Guarrasi et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 31
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [28][28] V. Guarrasi, et al., Optimized fusion of CNNs to diagnose pulmonary diseases on chest X-rays, in: International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, Springer, 2022, pp. 197-209. -
- [33][33] X. Glorot, et al., Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, in: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial - Intelligence and Statistics, JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2010, pp. 249-256. -
- [35][35] J. P. Cohen, et al., TorchXRayVision: A library of chest X-ray datasets and models, in: International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, PMLR, 2022, pp. 231-249. -
- Authors
- Guarrasi, V., Tronchin, L., Albano, D., Faiella, E., Fazzini, D., Santucci, D., & Soda, P.
- Affiliations
- Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
- University of Milan (IT)
- Ospedale Sant'Anna (IT)
- Centro Diagnostico Italiano (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Soda, Paolo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 156
- Pages
- 110825
- ISSN
- 0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4400944124
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Government of Italy Ministry of Education University and Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- counterfactual explanations, early risk detection, explainable deep learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review