The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsupervised skin tissue segmentation for remote photoplethysmography
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Segmentation is a critical step for many algorithms, especially for remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) applications as only the skin surface provides information. Moreover, it has been shown that the rPPG signal is not distributed homogeneously across the skin. Most of the time, algorithms get input information from face detection provided by a supervised learning of physical appearance and skin pixel selection. However, both methods show several limitations. In this paper, we propose a simple approach to implicitly select skin tissues based on their distinct pulsatility feature. The input video frames are decomposed into several temporal superpixels from which the pulse signals are extracted. A pulsatility measure from each temporal superpixel is then used to merge the pulse traces and estimate the photoplethysmogram signal. Since the most pulsatile signals provide high quality information, areas where the information is predominant are favored. We evaluated our contribution using a new publicly available dataset dedicated to rPPG algorithms comparison. The results of our experiments show that our method outperforms state of the art algorithms, without any critical face or skin detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features
Viola, P., & Jones, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2001.990517 · Cited by 18,300
Horn, B. K. P., & Schunck, B. G. (1981) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(81)90024-2 · Cited by 10,312
SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods
Achanta, R., Shaji, A., Smith, K., Lucchi, A., Fua, P., & Süsstrunk, S. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.120 · Cited by 9,201
Horn, B. K., & Schunck, B. G. (1981) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.965761 · Cited by 7,394
2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(2009) · doi:10.1109/cvpr14067.2009 · Cited by 5,550
2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
(2015) · doi:10.1109/cvpr31182.2015 · Cited by 3,737
Detection and Tracking of Point Features
Tomasi, C. (1991) · Cited by 2,231
Learning a classification model for segmentation
Ren, & Malik (2003) · Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2003.1238308 · Cited by 1,765
Remote plethysmographic imaging using ambient light
Verkruysse, W., Svaasand, L. O., & Nelson, J. S. (2008) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.16.021434 · Cited by 1,719
Non-contact, automated cardiac pulse measurements using video imaging and blind source separation
Poh, M.-Z., McDuff, D. J., & Picard, R. W. (2010) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.18.010762 · Cited by 1,643
Cited by
Advances in Photopletysmography Signal Analysis for Biomedical Applications
Moraes, J. L., Rocha, M. X., Vasconcelos, G. G., Vasconcelos Filho, J. E., De Albuquerque, V. H. C., & Alexandria, A. R. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18061894 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Bobbia, S., Macwan, R., Benezeth, Y., Mansouri, A., & Dubois, J.
- Venue
- Pattern Recognition Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 124
- Pages
- 82-90
- ISSN
- 0167-8655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2766766681
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsupervised skin tissue segmentation for remote photoplethysmography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.patrec.2017.10.017
- The paper
- Bobbia, S., Macwan, R., Benezeth, Y., Mansouri, A., & Dubois, J. (2019). Unsupervised skin tissue segmentation for remote photoplethysmography. Pattern Recognition Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2017.10.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.