Cited by 9Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Effects of chlordiazepoxide on single-unit activity in the septal region of the freely moving rat: aversive vs. non-aversive contexts

THOMAS, E, STRICKLAND, C, YADIN, E, BUROCK, D·2005·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

Evidence suggests that stimuli that have the property of inhibiting fear in a Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigm increase cellular activity in the lateral septum, a result consistent with the idea that the lateral septum is actively involved in the inhibition of fear. The experiments reported here were designed to determine if an anxiolytic drug with fear-inhibiting properties would also increase neuronal activity in the lateral septum in a manner that might relate to its mechanism of action as an anxiolytic. An experiment was performed to compare the effects of the benzodiazepine anxiolytic chlordiazepoxide (CDP) upon single-unit activity in the septal region of the rat brain during Pavlovian aversive conditioning with the effects of CDP in a non-aversive context. During Pavlovian conditioning there was a decrease in unit activity in the more lateral regions of the septum, the dorsolateral and ventrolateral nuclei, when a stimulus signaling footshock (CS+) was presented. This conditioned suppression of unit activity was blocked by an intraperitoneal injection of CDP. Additionally, CDP increased baseline unit activity in these regions in the absence of conditioned stimuli. In the more medial regions of the septum, the intermediate lateral septum, we observed few consistent changes either to the conditioned stimuli or to the drug. In a non-aversive context CDP had either no effect at low to moderate doses, or a suppressant effect at a higher dose. The results support a fear-relief hypothesis of lateral septal functioning and suggest the lateral septum as a possible site for the anxiolytic action of benzodiazepines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.10.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 9

Authors
THOMAS, E., STRICKLAND, C., YADIN, E., & BUROCK, D.
Affiliations
Bryn Mawr College (US)
Corresponding author
THOMAS, E
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
151-159
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088846565
Cited by
9
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh054674-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH54674)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
chlordiazepoxide, benzodiazepines, anxiolytic mechanism, lateral septum, single-unit activity, fear inhibition, footshock, conditioned suppression
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Chlordiazepoxide, Conditioning, Classical, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Motor Activity, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Septum of Brain, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review