Cited by 80Smoking Behavior and CessationPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Increased nicotine self-administration following prenatal exposure in female rats

Open access
LEVIN, E, LAWRENCE, S, PETRO, A, HORTON, K, SEIDLER, F, SLOTKIN, T·2006·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

There is a significant association between maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and greater subsequent risk of smoking in female offspring. In animal models, prenatal nicotine exposure causes persistent alterations in cholinergic and monoaminergic systems, both of which are important for nicotine actions underlying tobacco addiction. Accordingly, the current study was conducted to determine if there is a cause-and-effect relationship between prenatal nicotine exposure and nicotine self-administration starting in adolescence. Pregnant rats were administered nicotine (6 mg/kg/day) by osmotic minipump infusion throughout gestation and then, beginning in adolescence and continuing into adulthood, female offspring were given access to nicotine via a standard operant IV self-administration procedure (0.03 mg/kg/infusion). Gestational nicotine exposure did not alter the initial rate of nicotine self-administration. However, when animals underwent one week of forced abstinence and then had a second opportunity to self-administer nicotine, the prenatally-exposed animals showed a significantly greater rate of self-administration than did the controls. Prenatal nicotine exposure causes increased nicotine self-administration, which is revealed only when the animals are allowed to experience a period of nicotine abstinence. This supports a cause-and-effect relationship between the higher rates of smoking in the daughters of women who smoke cigarettes during pregnancy and implicates a role for nicotine in this effect. Our results further characterize the long-term liabilities of maternal smoking but also point to the potential liabilities of nicotine-based treatments for smoking cessation during pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.11.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 80

Authors
LEVIN, E., LAWRENCE, S., PETRO, A., HORTON, K., SEIDLER, F., & SLOTKIN, T.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
669-674
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024023117
Cited by
80
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Philip Morris International
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA015756, DA015756)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
prenatal nicotine exposure, nicotine self-administration, smoking during pregnancy, female offspring, adolescent nicotine exposure, nicotine abstinence, tobacco dependence, smoking cessation during pregnancy, cholinergic system, monoaminergic systems
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Fetus, Nicotine, Phenelzine, Pregnancy, Self Administration, Smoking Cessation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review