The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures
Zandalinas, S. I., Mittler, R., Balfagón, D., Arbona, V., & Gómez‐Cadenas, A. (2018) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.12540 · Cited by 1,179
Skubacz, A., Daszkowska-Golec, A., & Szarejko, I. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01884 · Cited by 499
Transcriptional regulation of drought response: a tortuous network of transcriptional factors
Singh, D., & Laxmi, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00895 · Cited by 462
Plant abiotic stress challenges from the changing environment
Pereira, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01123 · Cited by 338
Rezaul, I. M., Baohua, F., Tingting, C., Weimeng, F., Caixia, Z., Longxing, T., & Guanfu, F. (2019) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.12759 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoshida, T., Mogami, J., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 133-139
- ISSN
- 1369-5266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040811909
- Cited by
- 1,101
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.07.009
- The paper
- Yoshida, T., Mogami, J., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2014). ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.07.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
