Psychosocial factors in the development of coronary artery disease
Abstract
The fact that traditional risk factors only account for approximately two thirds of cases of coronary artery disease (CAD) has stimulated increasing interest in the relationship between CAD and psychosocial factors. Five areas--chronic stress, socioeconomic status (SES), personality, depression, and social support--have been most thoroughly examined. There is evidence to support a causal relationship between chronic stress, SES, depression, and social support and development of CAD. In this article, we discuss the epidemiologic evidence linking psychosocial factors and CAD, and review the effects of psychosocial factors on several pathophysiologic mechanisms that have been proposed as potential mediators of CAD. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, hypertension and cardiovascular reactivity, endothelial function, inflammatory markers, platelets, coagulation factors, fibrinogen, lipids, glucose metabolism, and lifestyle factors have all been implicated in this process. Recently, the first intervention trials have been carried out, although with initially disappointing results. Reducing the cardiovascular risk due to these psychosocial factors will be one of the major health care challenges in the future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poor psychosocial functioning may impact cardiovascular health via biological mechanisms such as cortisol hypersecretion, disturbed hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning, hypertension, and blood pressure reactivity to stress.
“Poor psychosocial functioning may impact on cardiovascular health via biological mechanisms such as cortisol hypersecretion and disturbed hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning, hypertension and blood pressure reactivity to stress”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 132 · Cited by 316
- Authors
- Strike, P. C., & Steptoe, A.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Strike, Philip C
- ORCID
- Steptoe, Andrew
- Venue
- Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-347
- ISSN
- 0033-0620 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029486887
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, psychosocial factors, chronic stress, socioeconomic status, personality, depression, social support, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, hypertension, cardiovascular reactivity, endothelial function, inflammatory markers, platelets, fibrinogen, lipids, glucose metabolism, lifestyle factors, cardiovascular risk
- MeSH terms
- Anger, Coronary Artery Disease, Depression, Endothelium, Vascular, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Personality, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Risk Factors, Social Class, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Platelet Activation, Comorbidity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review