Cited by 82Diabetes Treatment and ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesAcute Kidney Injury Research

SGLT2 inhibitors and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes with or without renal impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Seidu, Samuel, Kunutsor, Setor K., Cos, Xavier, Gillani, Syed, Khunti, Kamlesh·2018·Primary Care Diabetes

Abstract

Background Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may have renal protective effects in people with impaired kidney function. We assessed the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes with or without renal impairment [defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥30 and <60ml/min/1.73m 2 and/or UACR>300 and ≤5000mg/g] by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of available studies. Methods Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from MEDLINE, EMABASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and search of bibliographies to March 2017. No relevant observational study was identified. Summary measures were presented as mean differences and narrative synthesis performed for studies that could not be pooled. Results 42 articles which included 40 RCTs comprising 29,954 patients were included. In populations with renal impairment, SGLT2 inhibition compared with placebo was consistently associated with an initial decrease in eGFR followed by an increase and return to baseline levels. In pooled analysis of 17 studies in populations without renal impairment, there was no significant change in eGFR comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo (mean difference, 0.51ml/min/1.73m 2; 95% CI: -0.69, 1.72; p=403). SGLT2 inhibition relative to placebo was associated with preservation in serum creatinine levels or initial increases followed by return to baseline levels in patients with renal impairment, but levels were preserved in patients without renal impairment. In populations with or without renal impairment, SGLT2 inhibitors (particularly canagliflozin and empagliflozin) compared with placebo were associated with decreased urine albumin, improved albuminiuria, slowed progression to macroalbuminuria, and reduced the risk of worsening renal impairment, the initiation of kidney transplant, and death from renal disease. Conclusions Emerging data suggests that with SGLT2 inhibition, renal function seems to be preserved in people with diabetes with or without renal impairment. Furthermore, SGLT2 inhibition prevents further renal function deterioration and death from kidney disease in these patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.02.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The landmark RCTs demonstrated a reversible decrease in eGFR among those treated with an SGLT2i.

    “The landmark RCTs demonstrated a reversible decrease in eGFR among those treated with an SGLT2i.”

    From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [151]

    The indexed Abstract (page unavailable) reports an initial eGFR decrease followed by a return to baseline in SGLT2 inhibitor recipients with renal impairment. The claim omits that restriction: the review found no significant eGFR change in its pooled analysis of patients without renal impairment. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 82

Authors
Seidu, S., Kunutsor, S. K., Cos, X., Gillani, S., & Khunti, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Southmead Hospital (GB)
  • Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (ES)
  • University of Wolverhampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Seidu, Samuel
Venue
Primary Care Diabetes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
265-283
ISSN
1751-9918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793355388
Cited by
82
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Primary care diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
SGLT2 inhibitors, type 2 diabetes, renal dysfunction, estimated glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, macroalbuminuria, kidney disease progression, kidney transplantation, renal outcomes, canagliflozin, empagliflozin, serum creatinine
MeSH terms
Canagliflozin, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Adult, Aged, Benzhydryl Compounds, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Glucosides, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Renal Insufficiency, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review