Metformin and risk of cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Aim We carried out this meta-analysis on all published studies to estimate the overall cancer risk of the use of metformin in T2DM patients. Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase and CNKI databases for all articles within a range of published years from 2007 to 2019 on the association between the use of metformin and cancer risk in T2DM patients. The odds ratio (OR) corresponding to the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to assess the association using a random-effect meta-analysis. Results Finally, 67 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study, with 10,695,875 T2DM patients and 145,108 cancer cases. Overall, For T2DM patients of ever vs. never metformin users, there was statistical evidence of significantly decreased cancer risk was found to be associated with ever metformin users (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.65-0.76). Considering T2DM may be a specific and independent risk factor for various forms of cancer, due to its particular metabolic characteristics of glucose intolerance and hyperinsulinemia, we performed a comparison to estimate the effects of metformin on cancer risk with other anti-diabetes medications (ADMs), our results found significantly decreased cancer risk to be associated with the use of metformin (OR=0.80, 95% CI=0.73-0.87). Conclusion Our meta-analysis indicated that metformin may be a independent protective factor for cancer risk in T2DM patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Long-term use of metformin in type 2 diabetes patients is linked to a decline in tumor incidence and a reduced rate of cancer-related deaths.
“long-term use of metformin in type 2 diabetes patients has been linked to a decline in tumor incidence and a reduced rate of cancer-related deaths.192–196”
From Drug repurposing for cancer therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [194]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 100 · Cited by 84
- Authors
- Zhang, K., Bai, P., Dai, H., & Deng, Z.
- Affiliations
- Sichuan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Deng, Zhenhua
- Venue
- Primary Care Diabetes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-58
- ISSN
- 1751-9918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3037597678
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Primary care diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Keywords
- metformin, type 2 diabetes, cancer risk, cancer protection, hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose tolerance
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Metformin, Neoplasms, Glucose Intolerance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review