Cited by 178Diabetes Management and EducationChronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and Research

Self-management support in “real-world” settings: an empowerment-based intervention

Open access
Tang, Tricia S., Funnell, Martha M., Brown, Morton B., Kurlander, Jacob E.·2010·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective This study examined the impact of a 6-month, empowerment-based diabetes self-management support (DSMS) intervention on clinical outcomes, self-care behaviors, and quality of life (QOL) compared to a 6-month control period.Methods This control-intervention cohort study recruited 77 African-American adults with type 2 diabetes. Baseline, 6-month, and 12-month assessments measured A1C, weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, lipids, self-care behaviors, and QOL. During the control period, participants received weekly educational newsletters. During the intervention period, participants attended weekly DSMS groups as frequently as they needed. Sessions were guided by participants' self-management questions and concerns, and also emphasized experiential learning, coping, problem-solving, and goal-setting.Results The control period found significant improvements for diastolic BP (p<0.05), serum cholesterol (p<0.001), following a healthy diet (p<0.01), and monitoring blood glucose (p<0.01). The intervention period found significant additional improvements for A1C (p<0.001), weight (p<0.05), BMI (p<0.05), and LDL (p<0.001). Compared to the control period, participation in the intervention led to a significant reduction in A1C (p<0.01).Conclusion Findings suggest that an empowerment-based, DSMS intervention is promising for improving and/or maintaining diabetes-related health, particularly A1C.Practical implications Incorporating empowerment principles in DSMS interventions may be useful for supporting patients' self-management efforts in "real-world" settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.029

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 178

Authors
Tang, T. S., Funnell, M. M., Brown, M. B., & Kurlander, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Tang, Tricia S.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
178-184
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061402839
Cited by
178
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • National Institutes of Health (K23 DK068375, P60 DK20572)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes self-management support, type 2 diabetes, African American adults, HbA1c, self-care behavior, quality of life, experiential learning, goal setting, coping, blood glucose monitoring, blood pressure, serum cholesterol
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Michigan, Middle Aged, Power, Psychological, Self Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review