Cited by 29Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentHealth and Medical Research ImpactsInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Enhancing international collaboration among early career researchers

Open access
Carroll, Jennifer K., Albada, Akke, Farahani, Mansoureh, Lithner, Maria, Neumann, Melanie, Sandhu, Harbinder, Shepherd, Heather L.·2010·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective The European Association of Communication in Healthcare (EACH) Early Career Researchers Network (ECRN) aims are to (1) promote international collaboration among young investigators and (2) provide a support network for future innovative communication research projects. In October 2009, Miami, USA at a workshop facilitated by the ECRN at the International Conference on Communication in Healthcare (ICCH) hosted by the American Academy of Communication in Healthcare we explored common facilitators and challenges faced by early career researchers in health communication research. Methods Attendees introduced themselves, their research area(s) of interest, and listed one facilitator and one barrier for their career development. EACH ECRN members then led a discussion of facilitators and challenges encountered in communication research projects and career development. We discussed potential collaboration opportunities, future goals, and activities. Results Having supportive collegial relationships, institutional support, job security, and funding are critical facilitators for early career investigators. Key challenges include difficulty with time management and prioritizing, limited resources, and contacts. Conclusion International collaboration among early career researchers is a feasible and effective means to address important challenges, by increasing opportunities for professional support and networking, problem-solving, discussion of data, and ultimately publishing. Practice implications Future AACH-EACH Early Career Researcher Networks should continue to build collaborations by developing shared research projects, papers, and other scholarly products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.020

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [2]Henneman EA Lee JL Cohen JI Collaboration: a concept analysis J Adv Nurs 1995 21 103 9 7897060
  2. [3]Ho K Jarvis-Selinger S Borduas F Making interprofessional education work: the strategic roles of the academy Acad Med 2008 83 934 40 18820523
  3. [4]Horsburgh M Lamdin R Williamson E Multiprofessional learning: the attitudes of medical, nursing and pharmacy students to shared learning Medical Education 2001 35 876 83 11555226
  4. [5]Carr P Pololi L Knight S Conrad P Collaboration in academic medicine: Reflections on gender and advancement Acad Med 2009 84 1447 53 19881441
  5. [6]Ash AS Carr PL Goldstein R Friedman RH Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: is there equity? Ann Intern Med 2004 141 205 12 15289217
  6. [7]Bland CJ Schmitz CC Stritter FT Henry RC Aluise JJ Successful Faculty in Academic Medicine: Essential Skills and How to Acquire Them New York, NY Springer Publishing Company, Inc 1990
  7. [8]Archer SL The making of a physician-scientist-the process has a pattern: lessons from the lives of Nobel laureates in medicine and physiology Europ Heart J 2007 28 510 4 17208937
  8. [9]Brown AJ Swinyard W Ogle J Women in academic medicine: a report of focus groups and questionnaires, with conjoint analysis J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003 12 999 1008 14709188

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carroll, J. K., Albada, A., Farahani, M., Lithner, M., Neumann, M., Sandhu, H., & Shepherd, H. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
  • Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
417-420
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969955198
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K07CA126985)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
early-career researchers, international cooperation, health communication research, research career development, barriers and facilitators, collegial relationships, institutional support, research funding, time management, professional networking, research networks
MeSH terms
Communication, Congresses as Topic, Delivery of Health Care, Europe, Humans, International Cooperation, Interprofessional Relations, Research Personnel, United States, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review