Cited by 9Emotion and Mood RecognitionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVoice and Speech Disorders

A case study of vocal features associated with galvanic skin response to stressors in a clinical interaction.

Postma-Nilsenová, Marie, Holt, Erik, Heyn, Lena, Groeneveld, Kim, Finset, Arnstein·2016·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective We investigated vocal characteristics associated with physiologically determined stressful episodes by means of post-hoc acoustic analyses of speech recorded in a clinical setting. Our research addressed the understudied question of which vocal features may serve as cues naturally occurring stress and is the first to explore this issue in a pitch accent language. Methods The vocal profile of a single female patient interacting with a physician was analyzed with standard speech analysis software for acoustic indicators of stress-related arousal determined by galvanic skin response measurements. Results Vocal jitter, representing an aspect of voice quality perceived as hoarseness, appeared to increase during and immediately after skin conductance response intervals. Skin conductance levels during the response intervals were negatively correlated with acoustic features used to approximate the perception of voice unsteadiness (slope and standard deviation of fundamental frequency). Conclusion An acoustic analysis of vocal properties of speech uttered during independently detected skin conductance response intervals revealed individual patterns for some acoustic features linked to stress in earlier studies. Practice implications Non-invasive methods of arousal detection in physician-patient communication based on acoustic analyses of vocal profiles may, in combination with other analyses, help identify stressful events and thus improve the process of medical information gathering and decision-making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Postma-Nilsenová et al. (2016) found a negative correlation between SC-levels and F0 SD, slope and increased jitter levels in V3.

    “Postma-Nilsenová et al. (2016) found a negative correlation between SC-levels and F0 SD, slope and increased jitter levels in V3.”

    From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Postma-Nilsenová et al. (2016)

  • The different outcomes on jitter may be due to methodological issues in Postma-Nilsenová et al. (2016).

    “The different outcomes may be due to methodological issues in Postma-Nilsenová et al. (2016).”

    From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Postma-Nilsenová et al., 2016

  • Only one study found increased jitter during moments selected as stressful during a conversation between a medical doctor and his patient.

    “here was only one study that found increased jitter during moments that were selected as stressful during a conversation between a medical doctor and his patient (Postma-Nilsenová et al., 2016).”

    From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Postma-Nilsenová et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Postma-Nilsenová, M., Holt, E., Heyn, L., Groeneveld, K., & Finset, A.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole (NO)
Corresponding author
Postma-Nilsenová, Marie
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
99
Issue
8
Pages
1349-1354
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295971353
Cited by
9
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
voice characteristics, skin conductance, stress, voice quality, fundamental frequency, physician-patient communication, speech acoustics, arousal detection, clinical interaction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Psychophysiology, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Voice, Voice Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review