A case study of vocal features associated with galvanic skin response to stressors in a clinical interaction.
Abstract
Objective We investigated vocal characteristics associated with physiologically determined stressful episodes by means of post-hoc acoustic analyses of speech recorded in a clinical setting. Our research addressed the understudied question of which vocal features may serve as cues naturally occurring stress and is the first to explore this issue in a pitch accent language. Methods The vocal profile of a single female patient interacting with a physician was analyzed with standard speech analysis software for acoustic indicators of stress-related arousal determined by galvanic skin response measurements. Results Vocal jitter, representing an aspect of voice quality perceived as hoarseness, appeared to increase during and immediately after skin conductance response intervals. Skin conductance levels during the response intervals were negatively correlated with acoustic features used to approximate the perception of voice unsteadiness (slope and standard deviation of fundamental frequency). Conclusion An acoustic analysis of vocal properties of speech uttered during independently detected skin conductance response intervals revealed individual patterns for some acoustic features linked to stress in earlier studies. Practice implications Non-invasive methods of arousal detection in physician-patient communication based on acoustic analyses of vocal profiles may, in combination with other analyses, help identify stressful events and thus improve the process of medical information gathering and decision-making.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Postma-Nilsenová et al. (2016) found a negative correlation between SC-levels and F0 SD, slope and increased jitter levels in V3.
“Postma-Nilsenová et al. (2016) found a negative correlation between SC-levels and F0 SD, slope and increased jitter levels in V3.”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Postma-Nilsenová et al. (2016)
The different outcomes on jitter may be due to methodological issues in Postma-Nilsenová et al. (2016).
“The different outcomes may be due to methodological issues in Postma-Nilsenová et al. (2016).”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Postma-Nilsenová et al., 2016
Only one study found increased jitter during moments selected as stressful during a conversation between a medical doctor and his patient.
“here was only one study that found increased jitter during moments that were selected as stressful during a conversation between a medical doctor and his patient (Postma-Nilsenová et al., 2016).”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Postma-Nilsenová et al., 2016
Cites
Mapping emotions into acoustic space: the role of voice production.
Patel, S., Scherer, K. R., Björkner, E., & Sundberg, J. (2011) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.010 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
The Effect of the Heartbeat on Vocal Fundamental Frequency Perturbation
Orlikoff, R. F., & Baken, R. J. (1989) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3203.576 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
The association between possible stress markers and vocal symptoms.
Holmqvist, S., Santtila, P., Lindström, E., Sala, E., & Simberg, S. (2013) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.06.012 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance
Van Puyvelde, M., Neyt, X., McGlone, F., & Pattyn, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01994 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
MacPherson, M. K., Abur, D., & Stepp, C. E. (2017) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.021 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- Postma-Nilsenová, M., Holt, E., Heyn, L., Groeneveld, K., & Finset, A.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Postma-Nilsenová, Marie
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1349-1354
- ISSN
- 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2295971353
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Keywords
- voice characteristics, skin conductance, stress, voice quality, fundamental frequency, physician-patient communication, speech acoustics, arousal detection, clinical interaction
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Psychophysiology, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Voice, Voice Quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review