Analysis of the relationship among health awareness and health literacy, patient satisfaction levels with primary care in patients admitting to primary care health centers.
Open accessAbstract
Objective The aim of the study was to examine the relationships between health literacy, primary care satisfaction levels and health awareness of the patients who were admitted to primary care centers (Family Health Centers). Methods This is a cross-sectional study conducted on individuals who were admitted to Family Health Centers (n = 1.055) in Eskisehir province. The study data were collected by using Turkish Health Literacy Scale, the European Patients Evaluate General/Family Practice Scale and Health Awareness Scale. Results As health literacy of participants increases, health awareness and satisfaction with primary care also increases (for each, p Conclusion In the province of Eskisehir, the health literacy level of 7 out of 10 patients, who admitted to the primary care institution, is inadequate or problematic. As health awareness of participants increases, their level of health literacy also increases. As health literacy of participants increases, their satisfaction with family physicians also increases. Practice implications As an integral part of preventive health services, studies should be performed to increase and improve the level of health literacy of patients who are admitted to primary care services.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Health literacy was positively linked with health awareness and satisfaction among 1055 Turkish adult patients at primary healthcare.
“Furthermore, health literacy was found to be positively linked with health awareness and satisfaction among 1055 Turkish adult patients at primary healthcare [30].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Htay, M. N. N., Parial, L. L., Tolabing, M. C., Dadaczynski, K., Okan, O., Leung, A. Y. M., & Su, T. T. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266276 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Örsal, Ö., Duru, P., Örsal, Ö., Tırpan, K., & Çulhacı, A.
- Affiliations
- Eskişehir Osmangazi University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Duru, Pınar
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 376-382
- ISSN
- 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2890413361
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Keywords
- health literacy, health awareness, patient satisfaction, primary care, family health centers, general practitioners, preventive medicine, Eskişehir
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Turkey, Patient Satisfaction, Health Care Surveys, Health Literacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review