Effect of nurse-led program on the exercise behavior of coronary artery patients: Pender's Health Promotion Model
Abstract
Objective To determine the effect of nurse-led program based on Pender's Health Promotion Model on the exercise behaviors of coronary artery patients.Methods The two-arm parallel, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with a total of 62 patients, intervention (n = 32) and control group (n = 30). Intervention group received a nurse-led program based on Pender's Health Promotion Model and routine follow-ups of control group continued. The health perception, perceived exercise self efficacy, perceived exercise benefits/barriers, exercise-related effect, exercise frequency and time were assessed at baseline, 4th, 8th and 12th weeks. The data were evaluated by frequency, percentage, median, mean and standard deviation, chi-square, Friedman and Mann Whitney U tests.Results Health perception (62.6 ± 9.5; median:67.0; p < 0.001), perceived exercise benefit (105.8 ± 7.4; median:107.0; p < 0.001), perceived exercise self efficacy (71.2 ± 5.4; median: 71.5; p < 0.05), exercise-related effect (31.6 ± 6.0; median:34.0; p < 0.05), exercise frequency (4.8 ± 2.2; median:6.0 days/week; p < 0.05) and time (105.9 ± 53.6; median:130.0 min/week; p < 0.05) were higher and perceived barriers (43.1 ± 3.9; median: 42.0; p < 0.001) were lower in the intervention group at 12th week.Conclusions The nurse-led program has been shown to increase the exercise behavior in the intervention group.Practice implications Since it enables patients to gain and maintain exercise, it is highlighted the model to be integrated into clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pender's Health Promotion Model has been recognized as suitable for eliciting health promotion from nursing recipients based on previous studies.
“The model has been recognized as suitable for eliciting health promotion from nursing recipients based on previous studies of patients with chronic diseases [14,20,22], middle and high school students and college students [15,20,22], pregnant women and women of childbearing age, and general adults and workers [20,22,23].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Karataş, T., & Polat, Ü.
- Affiliations
- Gazi University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Karataş, Tuğba
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1183-1192
- ISSN
- 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3092027897
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- nurse-led program, Pender's health promotion model, exercise behavior, coronary artery disease, exercise self-efficacy, perceived barriers to exercise, perceived benefits of exercise, health perception, exercise frequency and duration
- MeSH terms
- Coronary Vessels, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Behavior, Exercise, Single-Blind Method, Nurse's Role
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review