Cited by 32Health and Wellbeing ResearchCardiac Health and Mental HealthPhysical Activity and Health

Effect of nurse-led program on the exercise behavior of coronary artery patients: Pender's Health Promotion Model

Karataş, Tuğba, Polat, Ülkü·2021·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective To determine the effect of nurse-led program based on Pender's Health Promotion Model on the exercise behaviors of coronary artery patients.Methods The two-arm parallel, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with a total of 62 patients, intervention (n = 32) and control group (n = 30). Intervention group received a nurse-led program based on Pender's Health Promotion Model and routine follow-ups of control group continued. The health perception, perceived exercise self efficacy, perceived exercise benefits/barriers, exercise-related effect, exercise frequency and time were assessed at baseline, 4th, 8th and 12th weeks. The data were evaluated by frequency, percentage, median, mean and standard deviation, chi-square, Friedman and Mann Whitney U tests.Results Health perception (62.6 ± 9.5; median:67.0; p < 0.001), perceived exercise benefit (105.8 ± 7.4; median:107.0; p < 0.001), perceived exercise self efficacy (71.2 ± 5.4; median: 71.5; p < 0.05), exercise-related effect (31.6 ± 6.0; median:34.0; p < 0.05), exercise frequency (4.8 ± 2.2; median:6.0 days/week; p < 0.05) and time (105.9 ± 53.6; median:130.0 min/week; p < 0.05) were higher and perceived barriers (43.1 ± 3.9; median: 42.0; p < 0.001) were lower in the intervention group at 12th week.Conclusions The nurse-led program has been shown to increase the exercise behavior in the intervention group.Practice implications Since it enables patients to gain and maintain exercise, it is highlighted the model to be integrated into clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 32

Authors
Karataş, T., & Polat, Ü.
Affiliations
Gazi University (TR)
Corresponding author
Karataş, Tuğba
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
104
Issue
5
Pages
1183-1192
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092027897
Cited by
32
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
nurse-led program, Pender's health promotion model, exercise behavior, coronary artery disease, exercise self-efficacy, perceived barriers to exercise, perceived benefits of exercise, health perception, exercise frequency and duration
MeSH terms
Coronary Vessels, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Behavior, Exercise, Single-Blind Method, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review