Battery Safety: Machine Learning-Based Prognostics
Open accessAbstract
Lithium-ion batteries play a pivotal role in a wide range of applications, from electronic devices to large-scale electrified transportation systems and grid-scale energy storage. Nevertheless, they are vulnerable to both progressive aging and unexpected failures, which can result in catastrophic events such as explosions or fires. Given their expanding global presence, the safety of these batteries and potential hazards from serious malfunctions are now major public concerns. Over the past decade, scholars and industry experts are intensively exploring methods to monitor battery safety, spanning from materials to cell, pack and system levels and across various spectral, spatial, and temporal scopes. In this Review, we start by summarizing the mechanisms and nature of battery failures. Following this, we explore the intricacies in predicting battery system evolution and delve into the specialized knowledge essential for data-driven, machine learning models. We offer an exhaustive review spotlighting the latest strides in battery fault diagnosis and failure prognosis via an array of machine learning approaches. Our discussion encompasses: (1) supervised and reinforcement learning integrated with battery models, apt for predicting faults/failures and probing into failure causes and safety protocols at the cell level; (2) unsupervised, semi-supervised, and self-supervised learning, advantageous for harnessing vast data sets from battery modules/packs; (3) few-shot learning tailored for gleaning insights from scarce examples, alongside physics-informed machine learning to bolster model generalization and optimize training in data-scarce settings. We conclude by casting light on the prospective horizons of comprehensive, real-world battery prognostics and management.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 296 · Cited by 216
- Authors
- Zhao, J., Feng, X., Pang, Q., Fowler, M., Lian, Y., Ouyang, M., & Burke, A. F.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Peking University (CN)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- BYD (China) (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Jingyuan
- Feng, Xuning
- Ouyang, Minggao
- Burke, Andrew F.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 101142
- ISSN
- 0360-1285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391018556
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 296
- Citations by year
- 2026: 81 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 43
- FWCI
- 23.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Progress in Energy and Combustion Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Keywords
- lithium-ion batteries, battery safety, battery failure mechanisms, battery prognostics, fault diagnosis, machine learning, reinforcement learning, unsupervised learning, semi-supervised learning, self-supervised learning, few-shot learning, physics-informed machine learning, battery degradation, battery management systems, battery pack
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review