Satisfaction With Primary Health Care Received by Families of Children With Developmental Disabilities
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the perceptions of families of children with developmental disabilities regarding their primary care physicians and to determine if differences exist for different conditions. Methods Mailed survey to families of children who had autism, physical disabilities (cerebral palsy or spina bifida) and mental retardation that included the Multidimensional Assessment of Parental Satisfaction for Children with Special Needs. Results One hundred twenty-one families responded. Families rated physicians highest on their ability to keep up with new aspects of care and on their sensitivity to the needs of children. Parents had the lowest ratings for the primary care physicians' ability to put them in touch with other parents, understanding of the impact of the child's condition on the family, ability to answer questions about the child's condition, and information and guidance for prevention. Physicians' knowledge about complementary and alternative medicine and their qualifications to manage developmental disabilities ranked worse than neutral. Families with a child with autism had more spontaneous negative comments and rated their primary care physicians lower on several aspects of care. They requested more information on complementary and alternative medicine and more support in the community. Discussion Families of children with developmental disabilities demonstrate dissatisfaction with several aspects of health care that can serve as areas for intervention by their health care providers. Families of children with autism in particular articulate dissatisfaction and voice unmet needs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Families of children with chronic or complex conditions report multiple unmet needs on information and physician collaboration, specifically on community services, condition understanding, and networking.
“Families of children with chronic or complex conditions report multiple unmet needs on information and physician collaboration [9, 10], specifically on community services, condition understanding, and networking [63, 64].”
From Family-Centered Care: Current Applications and Future Directions in Pediatric Health Care (2012) · cites this paper as [64]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 180
- Authors
- Liptak, G. S., Orlando, M., Yingling, J. T., Theurer-Kaufman, K. L., Malay, D. P., Tompkins, L. A., & Flynn, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liptak, Gregory S.
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Health Care
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 245-252
- ISSN
- 0891-5245 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044966321
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pediatric Health Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- parental satisfaction, primary care physicians, developmental disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, spina bifida, intellectual disability, family-centered care, physician-patient communication, complementary and alternative medicine, parental support needs
- MeSH terms
- Academic Medical Centers, Complementary Therapies, Attitude to Health, Autistic Disorder, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Clinical Competence, Family, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, New York, Physicians, Family, Primary Health Care, Professional-Family Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Nursing Methodology Research, Spinal Dysraphism, Patient-Centered Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review