Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and TreatmentVascular Malformations and HemangiomasFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemiology, Diagnostics, and Management of Vein of Galen Malformation

Brevis Nuñez, Francisco, Dohna-Schwake, Christian·2021·Pediatric Neurology
DOI 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.02.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Vein of Galen malformation (VGM) is a rare congenital intracerebral vascular malformation. The aim of this study was to gain reliable data about epidemiology; clinical manifestations; and pre-, peri- and postinterventional treatment strategies in Germany. Methods This prospective epidemiologic study was conducted by Erhebungseinheit für Seltene Pädiatrische Erkrankungen in Deutschland, a hospital-based German nationwide surveillance unit for rare pediatric diseases. Patients aged upto 18 years with a new diagnosis of VGM were prospectively included between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015. Results In the two-year study period, 30 individuals with newly diagnosed VGM were identified, resulting in an estimated annual incidence rate of VGM in Germany of at least 1: 58,100 live births. The main symptoms were age dependent. Neonates presented with mainly cardiac manifestations of high output failure; infants and older children mainly suffered from neurological complications. Of the patients with endovascular treatment 95% survived, but only 41% of these patients were discharged home without any complications. The Bicêtre Neonatal Evaluation Score was a good predictor for poor outcome but could have led to palliative care in some patients with good outcome. Conclusions The incidence of VGM in Germany is estimated to be 1:58,100 live births. The majority of patients were eligible for endovascular treatment. Nevertheless, due to side effects and long-term sequelae in…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.02.007

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Werlein, 2014, Planning delivery in cases of congenital malformations from the neonatologist’s point of view, Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol, 218, 27

Cited by

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Brevis Nuñez, F., & Dohna-Schwake, C.
ORCID
Dohna-Schwake, Christian
Venue
Pediatric Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
119
Pages
50-55
ISSN
0887-8994 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.02.007
OpenAlex
W3133772163
Cited by
35
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Pediatric Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
vein of Galen malformation, incidence, epidemiology, endovascular treatment, neurological complications, high-output heart failure, neonatal outcome prediction, palliative care, pediatric rare diseases, Germany
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Prospective Studies, Vein of Galen Malformations, Endovascular Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.