Cited by 9Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareSocial Media in Health Education

Internet Use Behavior Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Chronic Illnesses

Anikputa, Benedicta C., Horner, Sharon D.·2021·Journal of Pediatric Nursing

Abstract

Purpose Approximately 25% of adolescents and young adults (AYA) have special healthcare needs. Transitioning from a pediatric to an adult model of healthcare is an important event but most AYA with special health care needs and their families do not receive the preparation and support they need to transition to adult care. The purpose of this scoping review was to determine how AYA use the internet for health-related information. Methods Three databases were used CINAHL, Medline and PsycINFO with search terms including adolescent, young adult, chronic illness, internet, social media. Inclusion criteria were articles focused on AYA (16-25), use of internet or social media for health-related information, published in English between 2005 and 2020. Initial search yielded 369 articles, 335 were eliminated as not meeting the inclusion criteria. Findings Of the 34 remaining, 14 were eligible for inclusion. AYA used the internet for health concerns, socializing, entertainment, homework, general information, and shopping. AYA expressed concerns about disclosing personal health information and potential misinformation on websites. Few used it to look up their diagnosed condition or talk to illness peers. AYA report they also get information from non-internet sources like providers, parents, and peers. Conclusions AYA have a need for health-related information. When planning online resources critical issues include perceived threats to privacy and security and quality of information. Online resources must address these issues so AYA consumers can have confidence in their website.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.07.024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anikputa, B. C., & Horner, S. D.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Anikputa, Benedicta C.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
60
Pages
260-266
ISSN
0882-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3191439391
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
internet use, adolescents, young adults, chronic disease, health information seeking, social media, transition to adult care, special health care needs, online health information quality, privacy concerns, health misinformation, peer support
MeSH terms
Internet Use, Adolescent, Child, Chronic Disease, Humans, Social Behavior, Internet, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review