Cited by 59Crustacean biology and ecologyMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyIsotope Analysis in Ecology

Selective consumption and digestion of litter microbes by Porcellio scaber (Isopoda: Oniscidea)

Ihnen, Karen, Zimmer, Martin·2008·Pedobiologia

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pedobi.2007.06.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ihnen, K., & Zimmer, M.
Affiliations
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Corresponding author
Zimmer, Martin
Venue
Pedobiologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
51
Issue
5-6
Pages
335-342
ISSN
0031-4056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040007590
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pedobiologia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Keywords
Porcellio scaber, Isopoda, microbial digestion, actinomycetes, Pseudonocardia autotrophica, Gram-positive bacteria, cellulose, detritivores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review