CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38Sport Psychology and PerformanceMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The effects of psychological skills and mindfulness on well-being of student-athletes: A path analysis

Foster, Brian J., Chow, Graig M.·2020·Performance Enhancement & Health
DOI 10.1016/j.peh.2020.100180
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.peh.2020.100180

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 67 · Cited by 38

Authors
Foster, B. J., & Chow, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Lock Haven University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Foster, Brian J.
ORCID
Foster, Brian J.
Venue
Performance Enhancement & Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
8
Issue
2-3
Pages
100180
ISSN
2211-2669 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.peh.2020.100180
OpenAlex
W3094672298
Cited by
38
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Performance Enhancement & Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
psychological skills, mindfulness, student athletes, global well-being, nonjudgmental acceptance, college athletes, NCAA Division I, sport stress, psychological adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review