The l-arginine paradox: Importance of the l-arginine/asymmetrical dimethylarginine ratio
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are still the most frequent cause of death in Western Europe. Pathophysiological experiments revealed in the last years that the vascular endothelium, as well as a result of the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO), is a crucial regulator of vascular function and homeostasis. The vascular endothelium plays a key role in cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology, largely via NO-dependent processes. L-Arginine is the substrate for the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) to generate NO. Endothelial dysfunction is caused by various cardiovascular risk factors. In most studies, acute and chronic administration of L-arginine has been shown to improve endothelial function in animal models of hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis. Therefore, numerous studies have been conducted to elucidate whether dietary L-arginine supplementation can augment NO production in humans and thereby improve endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. The most likely mechanism that explains the occurrence of endothelial dysfunction and the effect of L-arginine is that application of L-arginine antagonizes asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), the endogenous NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor. This could solve the L-arginine paradox namely that L-arginine improves NO-mediated vascular function in vivo, although its baseline plasma concentration is about 25- to 30-fold higher than the Michaelis-Menten constant Km of the isolated, purified eNOS in vitro. Recent findings suggest that large, prospective, randomized clinical trials might be needed to identify those patients who are the most likely to benefit from L-arginine. Testing patients for ADMA and L-arginine plasma levels for calculating the L-arginine/ADMA ratio might be an adequate strategy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At high ADMA concentrations, l-arginine supplementation may not overcome eNOS inhibition, indicating the need to determine l-arginine/ADMA ratios to better assess l-arginine availability.
“At high ADMA concentrations, l-arginine supplementation may not overcome eNOS inhibition, indicating the need to determine l-arginine/ADMA ratios to better assess l-arginine availability (102, 106, 954).”
From Sources of Vascular Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species and Their Regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 129 · Cited by 347
- Authors
- BODEBOGER, S., SCALERA, F., & IGNARRO, L.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Magdeburg (DE)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-306
- ISSN
- 0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067261577
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 129
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer-related gene regulation
- Keywords
- L-arginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine, L-arginine/ADMA ratio, endothelial dysfunction, nitric oxide, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, endothelium-dependent vasodilation, cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, hypercholesterolemia, plasma biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arginine, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Dietary Supplements, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review