The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular basis and therapeutic implications of CD40/CD40L immune checkpoint
Open accessAbstract
The CD40 receptor and its ligand CD40L is one of the most critical molecular pairs of the stimulatory immune checkpoints. Both CD40 and CD40 L have a membrane form and a soluble form generated by proteolytic cleavage or alternative splicing. CD40 and CD40L are widely expressed in various types of cells, among which B cells and myeloid cells constitutively express high levels of CD40, and T cells and platelets express high levels of CD40L upon activation. CD40L self-assembles into functional trimers which induces CD40 trimerization and downstream signaling. The canonical CD40/CD40L signaling is mediated by recruitment of TRAFs and NF-κB activation, which is supplemented by signal pathways such as PI3K/AKT, MAPKs and JAK3/STATs. CD40/CD40L immune checkpoint leads to activation of both innate and adaptive immune cells via two-way signaling. CD40/CD40L interaction also participates in regulating thrombosis, tissue inflammation, hematopoiesis and tumor cell fate. Because of its essential role in immune activation, CD40/CD40L interaction has been regarded as an attractive immunotherapy target. In recent years, significant advance has been made in CD40/CD40L-targeted therapy. Various types of agents, including agonistic/antagonistic monoclonal antibodies, cellular vaccines, adenoviral vectors and protein antagonist, have been developed and evaluated in early-stage clinical trials for treating malignancies, autoimmune diseases and allograft rejection. In general, these agents have demonstrated favorable safety and some of them show promising clinical efficacy. The mechanisms of benefits include immune cell activation and tumor cell lysis/apoptosis in malignancies, or immune cell inactivation in autoimmune diseases and allograft rejection. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the structure, processing, cellular expression pattern, signaling and effector function of CD40/CD40L checkpoint molecules. In addition, we summarize the progress, targeted diseases and outcomes of current ongoing and completed clinical trials of CD40/CD40L-targeted therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targeting CD40-induced TRAF6 signaling in macrophages reduces atherosclerosis
Seijkens, T. T. P., van Tiel, C. M., Kusters, P. J. H., Atzler, D., Soehnlein, O., Zarzycka, B., Aarts, S. A. B. M., Lameijer, M., Gijbels, M. J., Beckers, L., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.055 · Cited by 195
Cited by
Small molecules targeting protein–protein interactions for cancer therapy
Wu, D., Li, Y., Zheng, L., Xiao, H., Ouyang, L., Wang, G., & Sun, Q. (2023) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2023.05.035 · Cited by 71
Wang, L.-M., Yang, C., Sun, X., Tian, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Wang, Z., Lin, Y., Wu, T., et al. (2025) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-24-0999 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, T., Cheng, X., Truong, B., Sun, L., Yang, X., & Wang, H.
- Venue
- Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 219
- Pages
- 107709
- ISSN
- 0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3094495571
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.