The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physical-layer network coding: Tutorial, survey, and beyond
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The concept of physical-layer network coding (PNC) was proposed in 2006 for application in wireless networks. Since then it has developed into a subfield of network coding with wide implications. The basic idea of PNC is to exploit the mixing of signals that occurs naturally when electromagnetic (EM) waves are superimposed on one another. In particular, at a receiver, the simultaneous transmissions by several transmitters result in the reception of a weighted sum of the signals. This weighted sum is a form of network coding operation by itself. Alternatively, the received signal could be transformed and mapped to other forms of network coding. Exploiting these facts turns out to have profound and fundamental ramifications. Subsequent works by various researchers have led to many new results in the domains of (1) wireless communication, (2) information theory, and (3) wireless networking. The purpose of this paper is fourfold. First, we give a brief tutorial on the basic concept of PNC. Second, we survey and discuss recent key results in the three aforementioned areas. Third, we examine a critical issue in PNC: synchronization. It has been a common belief that PNC requires tight synchronization. Recent results suggest, however, that PNC may actually benefit from asynchrony. Fourth, we propose that PNC is not just for wireless networks; it can also be useful in optical networks. We provide an example showing that the throughput of a passive optical network (PON) could potentially be raised by 100% with PNC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200611 · Cited by 36,808
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1002/047174882x · Cited by 13,791
The capacity of wireless networks
Gupta, P., & Kumar, P. R. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.825799 · Cited by 8,292
Ahlswede, R., Cai, N., Li, S.-Y. R., & Yeung, R. W. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.850663 · Cited by 7,814
Li, S.-Y. R., Yeung, R. W., & Cai, N. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2002.807285 · Cited by 3,378
Hot topic: physical-layer network coding
Zhang, S., Liew, S. C., & Lam, P. P. (2006) · Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking · doi:10.1145/1161089.1161129 · Cited by 1,512
Self-citationUnderstanding belief propagation and its generalizations
Yedidia, J. S., Freeman, W. T., & Weiss, Y. (2003) · Cited by 1,288
Embracing wireless interference: analog network coding
Katti, S., Gollakota, S., & Katabi, D. (2007) · ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM) · doi:10.1145/1282380.1282425 · Cited by 1,253
Compute-and-Forward: Harnessing Interference Through Structured Codes
Nazer, B., & Gastpar, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2011.2165816 · Cited by 990
Computation Over Multiple-Access Channels
Nazer, B., & Gastpar, M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2007.904785 · Cited by 753
Cited by
Compute-and-Forward: Harnessing Interference Through Structured Codes
Nazer, B., & Gastpar, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2011.2165816 · Cited by 990
Metadata
- Authors
- Liew, S. C., Zhang, S., & Lu, L.
- Venue
- Physical Communication
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 4-42
- ISSN
- 1874-4907 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111834530
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 56.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical-layer network coding: Tutorial, survey, and beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.phycom.2012.05.002
- The paper
- Liew, S. C., Zhang, S., & Lu, L. (2013). Physical-layer network coding: Tutorial, survey, and beyond. Physical Communication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phycom.2012.05.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.