Increasing awareness in classroom evacuation situations using agent-based modeling
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ABMs have proven effective in analysing crowd behaviour, evacuation processes, and pedestrian traffic.
“They have proven effective in analysing crowd behaviour (Hatta and Tuwo, 2023), evacuation processes (Delcea and Cotfas, 2019;Chen et al., 2019), and pedestrian traffic (Ma et al., 2023).”
From Towards integrated management of sandy anthropogenic shores: Developing tools for the exploration of human-natural interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Delcea and Cotfas, 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bakhshianlamouki, E., Augustijn, E.-W., Brugnach, M., Voinov, A., & Wijnberg, K. (2025) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/adc353
- Authors
- Delcea, C., & Cotfas, L.-A.
- Affiliations
- Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
- Corresponding author
- Delcea, Camelia
- Venue
- Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 523
- Pages
- 1400-1418
- ISSN
- 0378-4371 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2941822396
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Education, Safety, and Science Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
- Keywords
- agent-based modeling, NetLogo, fire safety education, evacuation time, school fires, student safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
