The effects of objectively-measured, free-living daily ambulatory movement on mortality in a national sample of adults with diabetes
Abstract
Previous research demonstrates that self-reported physical activity is protective against premature mortality among the general population, as well as those with diabetes. This confirmatory research study examines the relationship between physical activity and all-cause mortality risk among a national sample of diabetics while employing an objective measure of physical activity (ActiGraph 7164). Data from the 2003-2006 NHANES were employed, with follow-up through 2011.Among the 712 diabetics, 134 died during the median follow-up period of 79months. For every 60min increase in daily ambulatory movement, adults with diabetes had a 29% reduced risk of premature all-cause mortality (HRadjusted=0.71; 95% CI: 0.60-0.85). These confirmatory findings underscore the importance of physical activity promotion among adults with diabetes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior accelerometry-based studies specific to patients with type 2 diabetes were scant but all demonstrated significant risk reductions in mortality-related outcomes with higher volumes of physical activity.
“Prior accelerometry-based studies specific to T2D patients were scant but all demonstrated significant risk reductions in mortality-related outcomes with higher volumes of PA, such as a 29% lower risk of premature all-cause mortality for every 60-min increase in daily ambulatory movement in the NHANES and a 2.6% lower risk of a composite CVD outcome including all-cause mortality for every 100 MET-”
From Accelerometer-derived physical activity and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Two studies from NHANES, a study from the Look AHEAD Trial, and a study from the Walking Away from Type 2 Diabetes trial all demonstrated significant risk reductions related to all-cause mortality with higher volumes of physical activity.
“Two studies derived from the NHANES, a study from the Look AHEAD Trial and a study from the Walking Away from Type 2 Diabetes trial all demonstrated significant risk reductions in related to all-cause mortality with higher volumes of PA17–20.”
From Accelerometer-derived physical activity and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Loprinzi, P. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Mississippi (US)
- Corresponding author
- Loprinzi, Paul D.
- ORCID
- Loprinzi, Paul D.
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 154
- Pages
- 126-128
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2179798485
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- physical activity, diabetes mellitus, all-cause mortality, accelerometry, ActiGraph, free-living physical activity, premature mortality, NHANES
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Nutrition Surveys, Retrospective Studies, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult, Self Report, Accelerometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
