Cited by 37Pain Management and Placebo EffectPain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

A preliminary investigation into the effects of active interferential current therapy and placebo on pressure pain sensitivity: a random crossover placebo controlled study

Fuentes C, Jorge, Armijo-Olivo, Susan, Magee, David J., Gross, Douglas P.·2011·Physiotherapy

Abstract

Objective (1) To determine the effect of active and placebo interferential current on muscle pain sensitivity using an experimental mechanically induced pain model. (2) To evaluate the predictive role of expectations, gender, baseline muscle pain sensitivity, and intervention order on placebo response. Design Randomized placebo controlled cross-over trial. Setting University research laboratory. Participants Forty healthy volunteers (20 females, 20 males). Interventions Active interferential current, placebo (sham) interferential current, and no treatment/control were applied to the lumbar area on different days. Main outcomes measures Pressure pain thresholds and placebo response. Results The two-way ANOVA with repeated measures analysis determined a significant interaction between condition and time (P=0.002). Pairwise comparisons found differences between active interferential and the control condition at 15 minutes into treatment (mean difference=0.890 kg/cm(2), 95% CI 0.023 to 1.757, P=0.043) and at 30 minutes into treatment (mean difference=0.910 kg/cm(2), 95% CI 0.078 to 1.742, P=0.028). The increase in pressure pain thresholds between the active interferential and the control condition (1.12 kg/cm(2)) was clinically meaningful. Logistic regression analysis showed that the condition sequence order was the only variable that predicted placebo response (odds ratio 9.7; P=0.028). If a subject started the sequence receiving placebo treatment first, the odds of responding t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physio.2011.01.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuentes C, J., Armijo-Olivo, S., Magee, D. J., & Gross, D. P.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Physiotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
291-301
ISSN
0031-9406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170269258
Cited by
37
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
interferential therapy, placebo response, pressure pain threshold, placebo responders, expectancy effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Humans, Lumbosacral Region, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Pressure, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Logistic Models, Pain Threshold, Muscle, Skeletal, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review