The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy
Open accessAbstract
The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is set to rise in physiotherapy. PROMs provide additional 'patient-centred' data which is unique in capturing the patient's own opinion on the impact of their disease or disorder, and its treatment, on their life. Thus, PROMs are increasingly used by clinicians to guide routine patient care, or for the purposes of audit, and are already firmly embedded in clinical research. This article seeks to summarise the key aspects of PROM use for physiotherapists, both in routine clinical practice and in the research setting, and highlights recent developments in the field. Generic and condition-specific PROMs are defined and examples of commonly used measures are provided. The selection of appropriate PROMs, and their effective use in the clinical and research settings is discussed. Finally, existing barriers to PROM use in practice are identified and recent physiotherapy PROM initiatives, led by the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy are explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006 · Cited by 4,465
Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2012) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1 · Cited by 1,978
Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare
Black, N. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f167 · Cited by 1,960
Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient‐Reported Outcomes
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007) · doi:10.1002/9780470024522 · Cited by 865
A New Approach to the Measurement of Quality of Life: The Patient-Generated Index
Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., Russell, I. T., & MacDonald, L. M. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199411000-00004 · Cited by 527
Patient‐reported outcome measures in the NHS: new methods for analysing and reporting EQ‐5D data
Devlin, N. J., Parkin, D., & Browne, J. (2010) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1608 · Cited by 264
Coyne, K. S., Tubaro, A., Brubaker, L., & Bavendam, T. (2006) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.042 · Cited by 96
Cited by
Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review
Meirte, J., Hellemans, N., Anthonissen, M., Denteneer, L., Maertens, K., Moortgat, P., & Van Daele, U. (2020) · JMIR Perioperative Medicine · doi:10.2196/15588 · Cited by 308
Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Berg Balance Scale Scores in People with Acute Stroke
Song, M.-J., Lee, J.-H., & Shin, W.-S. (2018) · Physical therapy rehabilitation science · doi:10.14474/ptrs.2018.7.3.102 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Kyte, D. G., Calvert, M., van der Wees, P. J., ten Hove, R., Tolan, S., & Hill, J. C.
- Venue
- Physiotherapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-125
- ISSN
- 0031-9406 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021691581
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physio.2014.11.003
- The paper
- Kyte, D. G., Calvert, M., van der Wees, P. J., ten Hove, R., Tolan, S., & Hill, J. C. (2015). An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2014.11.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
