Cryptanalysis of a new image encryption algorithm based on hyper-chaos
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only three couples of plaintext/ciphertext were enough to break the encryption in CPA and CCA for the image-encryption algorithm in [61].
“The results show that only three couples of plaintext/ciphertext were enough to break the encryption in CPA and CCA.”
From Chaos-Based Image Encryption: Review, Application, and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [176]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 241
- Authors
- Rhouma, R., & Belghith, S.
- Affiliations
- National Engineering School of Tunis (TN)
- Corresponding author
- Rhouma, Rhouma
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 372
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 5973-5978
- ISSN
- 0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071379504
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 14.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
- Keywords
- image encryption, cryptanalysis, chosen-plaintext attack, chosen ciphertext attack, logistic map, keystream generation, pixel correlation, key recovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
