The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cosmology and astrophysical constraints of Gauss–Bonnet dark energy
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Cosmological consequences of a string-motivated dark energy scenario featuring a scalar field coupled to the Gauss–Bonnet invariant are investigated. We study the evolution of the universe in such a model, identifying its key properties. The evolution of the homogeneous background and cosmological perturbations, both at large and small scales, are calculated. The impact of the coupling on galaxy distributions and the cosmic microwave background is examined. We find the coupling provides a mechanism to viably onset the late acceleration, to alleviate the coincidence problem, and furthermore to effectively cross the phantom divide at the present while avoiding a Big Rip in the future. We show the model could explain the present cosmological observations, and discuss how various astrophysical and cosmological data, from the Solar system, supernovae Ia, cosmic microwave background radiation and large scale structure constrain it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Riess, A. G., Strolger, L., Tonry, J., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Challis, P., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383612 · Cited by 4,315
Cited by
Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: From F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models
Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2011) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.04.001 · Cited by 4,366
In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D. F., Riess, A. G., & Silk, J. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d · Cited by 2,065
Self-citationModels off(R)cosmic acceleration that evade solar system tests
Hu, W., & Sawicki, I. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.064004 · Cited by 1,736
Quintom cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations
Cai, Y.-F., Saridakis, E. N., Setare, M. R., & Xia, J.-Q. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.04.001 · Cited by 868
Bamba, K., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2008) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/045 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Koivisto, T., & Mota, D. F.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 644
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 104-108
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988270939
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
