The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electroweak Higgs as a pseudo-Goldstone boson of broken scale invariance
Open accessAbstract
We point out that it is possible to associate the electroweak Higgs boson with the pseudo-Goldstone boson of broken scale invariance, thus resolving the hierarchy problem in a technically natural way. We illustrate this idea with two specific gauge models. Besides being consistent with all currently available experimental data, both models maintain the predictive power of the standard model, since the first model has only one additional parameter beyond the Standard Model, and the second has the same number of free parameters as the Standard Model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Salvio, A., & Strumia, A. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2014)080 · Cited by 304
Bare Higgs mass at Planck scale
Hamada, Y., Kawai, H., & Oda, K.-Y. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.053009 · Cited by 104
Is the standard model saved asymptotically by conformal symmetry?
Gorsky, A., Mironov, A., Morozov, A., & Tomaras, T. N. (2015) · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1134/s1063776115030218 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Foot, R., Kobakhidze, A., & Volkas, R. R.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 655
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 156-161
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039080310
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electroweak Higgs as a pseudo-Goldstone boson of broken scale invariance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.06.084
- The paper
- Foot, R., Kobakhidze, A., & Volkas, R. R. (2007). Electroweak Higgs as a pseudo-Goldstone boson of broken scale invariance. Physics Letters B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.06.084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
