CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Erratum to “Cosmology with torsion: An alternative to cosmic inflation” [Phys. Lett. B 694 (2010) 181]

Popławski, Nikodem J.·2011·Physics Letters B
DOI 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.05.047
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.05.047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relation (15) between a and T does not depend on the presence of spin.

    “Relation (15) between a and T does not depend on the presence of spin (Popławski 2010c(Popławski , 2011a)).”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Popławski 2011a

  • If we define x = a/a_min and choose t = 0 at a = a_min, then integrating Equation (23) gives Equation (24).

    “If we define x=a/a min and choose t=0 at a=a min , then integrating Equation (23) gives (Popławski 2010c, 2011a)”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Popławski 2011a

  • This scenario could also explain the arrow of time and the black hole information paradox.

    “This scenario could also explain the arrow of time and the black hole information paradox (Popławski 2010c(Popławski , 2011a(Popławski , 2014)).”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Popławski 2011a

  • This value solves both the flatness and horizon problems.

    “This value solves both the flatness and horizon problems (Popławski 2010c(Popławski , 2011a)).”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Popławski 2011a

  • This scenario simultaneously can explain the future of black hole interiors and the origin of the universe.

    “This scenario simultaneously can explain the future of black hole interiors and the origin of the universe (Popławski 2010c(Popławski , 2011a)).”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Popławski 2011a

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popławski, N. J.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Popławski, Nikodem J.
ORCID
Popławski, Nikodem J.
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
701
Issue
5
Pages
672
ISSN
0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.physletb.2011.05.047
OpenAlex
W2315460106
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Physics Letters B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
torsion, flatness problem, horizon problem, bounce cosmology, closed universe, Big Bang origin, black hole collapse, early universe cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review