The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Helioseismology and solar abundances
Open accessAbstract
Helioseismology has allowed us to study the structure of the Sun in unprecedented detail. One of the triumphs of the theory of stellar evolution was that helioseismic studies had shown that the structure of solar models is very similar to that of the Sun. However, this agreement has been spoiled by recent revisions of the solar heavy-element abundances. Heavy-element abundances determine the opacity of the stellar material and hence, are an important input to stellar model calculations. The models with the new, low abundances do not satisfy helioseismic constraints. We review here how heavy-element abundances affect solar models, how these models are tested with helioseismology, and the impact of the new abundances on standard solar models. We also discuss the attempts made to improve the agreement of the low-abundance models with the Sun and discuss how helioseismology is being used to determine the solar heavy-element abundances. A review of current literature shows that attempts to improve agreement between solar models with low heavy-element abundances and seismic inference have been unsuccessful so far. The low-metallicity models that have the least disagreement with seismic data require changing all input physics to stellar models beyond their acceptable ranges. Seismic determinations of the solar heavy-element abundances yield results that are consistent with the older, higher values of the solar abundance, and hence, no major changes to the inputs to solar models are required to make higher-metallicity solar models consistent with the helioseismic data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., Allard, F., Barman, T., Bodnarik, J. G., Hauschildt, P. H., Heffner‐Wong, A., & Tamanai, A. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428642 · Cited by 1,327
Cited by
The Chemical Composition of the Sun
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 · Cited by 9,346
“When instead employing the revised values of Asplund, Grevesse & Sauval (2005), this is no longer the case (e.g. Bahcall et al. 2005, Basu & Antia 2004, 2008, Delahaye & Pinsonneault 2006, Guzik, Watson & Cox 2005, Turck-Chièze et al. 2004).”
BackgroundMethodA higher-than-predicted measurement of iron opacity at solar interior temperatures
Bailey, J. E., Nagayama, T., Loisel, G. P., Rochau, G. A., Blancard, C., Colgan, J., Cosse, P., Faussurier, G., Fontes, C. J., Gilleron, F., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14048 · Cited by 441
Solar System Abundances of the Elements
Lodders, K. (2010) · Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10352-0_8 · Cited by 348
Mowlavi, N., Eggenberger, P., Meynet, G., Ekström, S., Georgy, C., Maeder, A., Charbonnel, C., & Eyer, L. (2012) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117749 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Basu, S., & Antia, H. M.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 457
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 217-283
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070986244
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Helioseismology and solar abundances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.002
- The paper
- Basu, S., & Antia, H. M. (2008). Helioseismology and solar abundances. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.